This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Grace E. Dougle (talk | contribs) at 20:36, 23 February 2007 (move comment into appropriate section for strange users comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:36, 23 February 2007 by Grace E. Dougle (talk | contribs) (move comment into appropriate section for strange users comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome
|
Your user page looks familar! Also, PTSD
Is that my layout? :D If so , I hope you like it.
As far as the PTSD thing goes, the list that was added is not appropiate. While I appreciate sarcasm, you'll find few other people do. A lot of psychological articles on Misplaced Pages are messy, and I sort of gave up even trying back when I was editing from IPs, but the simplest thing to do is open up a straw poll. Anyone who knows anything about psychology or PTSD will know that list is both too broad and yet, too specific. --Elaragirl 01:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Section for strange remarks by user:DPeterson
Pls do not remove the tags unless you add a relevant citation. Doing so is not consistent with Misplaced Pages standards. DPeterson 23:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC) Reverting Bipolar article: Rather than continuing to revert what many editors feel is an inappropriate section, the proper Misplaced Pages practice would be to begin some dispute resolution process. I have done so, I hope you will participate and cooperate and not continue to merely revert the edits.DPeterson 13:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Answer: I'm speechless at your twisting things, but not surprised.--Grace E. Dougle 15:01, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
While you may be correct that those responses belong elsewhere, it is not your place to edit the Rfc page. Leave that to an administrator or those who will be handling the case. So, please stop your editing of that page. Generally it is bad form to edit another's comments or to move, delete, or change those comments. RalphLender 20:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Business and Econ Project Work
|
The Business and Economics Barnstar | |
| You're a GREAT help to the Business and Economics Project -- please keep helping us! SueHay 03:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC) |
- Grace E. Dougle, many thanks for the star! Look forward to working with you! SueHay 02:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Non-bp
If you want an article on this topic please find some real encyclopaedic information from sources that accord with WP:NOTE, WP:RS and WP:OR. Please see discussion on merging and redirect . --Zeraeph 18:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- I am sorry, but you seem to be somewhat misinformed about both the book, and, at least one of, it's authors. Randy Kreger is, at best, trained as a Public Relations Officer, hardly an academic. The book is not supported by any scientific studies or "peer reviewed" in any academic sense. The book is agenda driven, verges, at times, upon incitment to hatred, and appears to be virtually unknown outside a tightly knit and rather self appointed online culture of psychology in it's loosest sense.
- Regardless, if the concept of "Non-bp" is notable I am sure you will have no trouble in finding plenty of sources that are verifiable and from reliable sources with which to build a suitably encyclopaedic article. I can even get you started by informing you that a very well accredited academic called Michael J Formica seems to be writing a book on "counterborderline", I am not to sure how far progressed this is. --Zeraeph 20:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- I hope you don't mind me asking, but do I know you from somewhere? You seem awfully familiar?
- Whatever one might say in the general sense, Misplaced Pages is an encylopaedia, (see WP:NOT, so that articles related to psychology do most definately require the backing of empirical evidence and academic peer review and acknowledgement, not any personal perception of "common sense", which is after all very subjective...for example, the world in not and ideal place, that does not mean "Mein Kampf" is the solution, even though it represented one man's "common sense" of such.--Zeraeph 21:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well I am afraid it is not just my reasoning (though personally I find the prevalence of self appointed, unccountable and unregulated *expertise*, particularly in online psychology, truly terrifying), it is also Misplaced Pages protocol. But don't worry, if your topic is truly valid you will always be able to find verifiable academic sources for it somewhere, it's just a matter of looking, and when you have found them, the resulting article will be so much more worthwhile and carry so much more weight for you.
- You might find this discussion interesting too . Glad we cleared that up, I really could have sworn I knew you. --Zeraeph 22:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- That may be so, but I am afraid ALL of them are supposed to be based on that kind of evidence, particularly nin areas related to science and medical matters. However I see no point in continuing to argue, you surely would do better to spend the same time looking for valid sources instead? --Zeraeph 23:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- I am not going to continue to argue in circles with you, please find real, academic sources for the article. --Zeraeph 09:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Category:Batman-inspired_heroes_and_villains
Hello Grace. You suggested making lists for Category:Batman-inspired heroes and Category:Batman-inspired villains at CFD. I've closed the discussion as delete after listifying. I wonder if you'd be interested in doing the listing? Quite a lot of the info is already in List of Batman pastiches (and maybe Batman in popular media). I could have a go, but I'm not really much of a Batman fan, and I'd be unlikely to do a good job! I've also left a note with User:Otto4711. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Otto must have had them ready, up his sleeve: both done. Thanks anyway! Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)