This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 07:12, 14 August 2022 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Victor Trevor/Archive 1) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:12, 14 August 2022 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Victor Trevor/Archive 1) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Kelli Underwood
I see that you requested page protection for this article. However, as I see it, one IP editor made this fairly egregiously non-WP:NPOV edit which was not picked up, and then another IP editor made a string of successive edits adding WP:UNDUE and WP:RECENTISM content (sourced predominantly to the deprecated WP:DAILYMAIL.) which were reverted by CTL24. Since then, you and that editor have continued to revert one another without discussing on the talk page. Can you please explain further or clarify? Thanks Melcous (talk) 13:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, @Melcous. Thanks for letting me know. I have been focused on removed content and thought that is a typical-deleting issue on the pages. I've missed that part, which is an NPOV problem. Now I will delete all warnings and apologies for my fault. FYI, @Glen. --Victor Trevor (talk) 13:16, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- No worries, happens to all of us, and it is probably (sadly) somewhat uncommon for a new editor to be being helpful rather than not! Cheers Melcous (talk) 13:23, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
User CTL24
Just an FYI I think that user may've been trying to be helpful. Their removal included vandalism, specifically "She is known for calling the GWS Giants, The orange Team as well as being the worst AFL commentator known on this earth.". I've protected the page for two days all the same as multiple IPs adding nonsense. Thanks. Glen (talk) 13:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks Glen, as I attempted to note above, I think something has gone awry here as the multiple edits that were reverted were also in my view appropriate. Melcous (talk) 13:11, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Melcous, just saw your note too. Agree with your comments. I protected the page mainly due to the IPs this and this (also this but older) however looking at the history may've been premature. Happy to unprotect if you disagree. Thanks Glen (talk) 13:14, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- No worries Glen, I don't think the TPP hurts given the initial issue was IP vandalism. Cheers, Melcous (talk) 13:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Melcous, just saw your note too. Agree with your comments. I protected the page mainly due to the IPs this and this (also this but older) however looking at the history may've been premature. Happy to unprotect if you disagree. Thanks Glen (talk) 13:14, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Your protection requests
Hi, I've declined your requests to protect Uri Geller and U2, simply because there isn't anywhere near enough recent activity to justify protection. As a general rule of thumb, for a legitimate protection I would expect the history to contain multiple inappropriate edits from a variety of new users and IPs, easily filling up the history for the last 24-48 hours. Ritchie333 22:50, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, @Ritchie333. I appreciate your message. I thought it would be a good reason to protect the pages, considering the problem of spreading over time. In the coming days, I should have to read the protection policy entirely. Cheers! --Victor Trevor (talk) 23:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)