This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Essjay (talk | contribs) at 02:16, 24 February 2007 (→ethics again (sorry, but i don't think this is resolved yet...): I've said what I intend to say. I will say no more.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:16, 24 February 2007 by Essjay (talk | contribs) (→ethics again (sorry, but i don't think this is resolved yet...): I've said what I intend to say. I will say no more.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)User talk:Essjay/Top User:Essjay/Talk TOC
Techincal question
Following this one, is there a way the underlying address(es) can be blocked? If you need the CU info to do this, could you oblige (maybe 6 months if you are unwilling to indef an IP)? Thanks. yandman 11:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'll have to look and see who else may be affected; if I remember right, it was a fairly large range, so it may not be possible to block him without blocking a bunch of other users. Essjay (Talk) 12:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism by my account
Hi I noticed I got a message saying my account Vandalised some articles.
I will not delete the message. So would you be able to find out what vandalism was done by my account.
I'm 100% sure it was my brother.
If you are able, can you please tell me what he did when he edited. Thanks.
I'm really sorry about him. He's an idiot. I just found out what he did and have warned him. Thank You. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chiloe (talk • contribs) 16:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC).
Arbcom
Well apparently you finally got landed with the one job you've managed to dodge so far. Congratulations and commiserations in equal measure! I'm sure you will be a fine arbitrator. the wub "?!" 23:02, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Essjay, do you have to be everything? Share a little! :) Congrats, though this will be quite a workload to add to you. Don't take so many jobs you can't do them all. That said, I am sure you will do an excellent job. Prodego 23:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- congrats! Cbrown1023 talk 00:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Congratulations Essjay :) Majorly (o rly?) 00:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Guess what...congratulations! Yeah. –Llama mancontribs 00:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- I join the chorus with congratulations and commiserations. May the job be kind on you and you on it. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes the ArbCom will look a bit more interesting with more purple/violet floating around there. Big one of those → :-) Congrats Essjay! (→Netscott) 01:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Have a great time and do good things for Misplaced Pages as an arbitrator (which I know you will)! And don't let it all burn you out, OK? Heimstern Läufer 01:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes the ArbCom will look a bit more interesting with more purple/violet floating around there. Big one of those → :-) Congrats Essjay! (→Netscott) 01:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Congratulations Essjay :) Majorly (o rly?) 00:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- congrats! Cbrown1023 talk 00:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oh dear. Another icon at the top of this page... when will it end? ;) Titoxd 02:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Arbitration - Participation in pending cases
When the new arbitrators took office at the beginning of the year, the decision was made that they would be considered as recused/non-participating in cases that had been accepted before they came in, but could elect to participate in any such case either by noting that they would be participating or by voting. At that point the Clerks adjusted the list of active arbitrators for that case and the majority accordingly. Would you like to proceed on the same basis for the cases that were pending as of this morning? This is significant because we have some cases nearing closing and have to make sure whom to include in calculating the majority. Thanks, Newyorkbrad 02:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)