Misplaced Pages

:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aoidh (talk | contribs) at 23:20, 21 August 2022 (User:Aoidh: Removing duplicate signature). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:20, 21 August 2022 by Aoidh (talk | contribs) (User:Aoidh: Removing duplicate signature)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Requests for permissions
Common
Uncommon
Logs
Special
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
This notice is automatically updated by MusikBot (talk) and will hide when there are fewer than 3 requests and they are all under 7 days old.

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions. (add request · view requests) Shortcuts Please read Misplaced Pages:Autopatrolled before requesting or nominating another user for this right. Applicants are unlikely to be granted this right if they have created fewer than 25 new articles, excluding redirects and disambiguation pages. Note that this right will not help you create or patrol articles.

User:Aoidh

I've never had a NPP reviewer take issue with any of my articles and I wanted to request the right to try to lessen the queue. Of the articles I have created, one from 2012 was deleted and one from 2015 was redirected. Other than that, a lot of them I recently created are sent to DYK and hopefully GA, so they'll certainly have eyes on them regardless, but with the autopatrolled right they won't be taking up space in the NPP queue. - Aoidh (talk) 15:08, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

User:Haoreima

I have created 80 articles and 4000+ edit counts in English wikipedia. Most of the articles I have created are reviewed by many reviewers without any further editing on those pages from their side (in most cases). I know this as I received notifications about my articles being reviewed. I think that the reviewers of my articles are usually satisfied with me, it's just my thought. So, I think I should not give a burden to the reviewers who are checking on the list of articles pending for review in this wiki. So, I wish to achieve the autopatrolled user right. In other wikis, I have autopatrolled user rights in Wikimedia Commons and Meta wiki, IP block exemption user right in Meitei wikipedia.

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Haoreima (talk) 14:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

User:NeverTry4Me

Please do not give me this right. I am happy with AFC creation. -✍ NeverTry4Me⛅ C♯ 15:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

 Not done (for the bot) given that you are currently restricted to creating new pages through AfC. NeverTry4Me, why would you post here (the place where people request autopatrolled) to say that you don't want autopatrolled? What did you expect an administrator to do with this request? DanCherek (talk) 15:38, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
@DanCherek: I am restricted to my own articles, but not for others, having created 60+ AFC-accepted articles, I have learned what is NPR.  Not done Not done shouldn't be the logic where my restriction (till 6 September 2022) nearing a short period, or other users' created articles. If grunt, I won't ever use it as a benefit of my own articles (as I vowed for 10K+ AfC accepted articles publicly), and I have never created/edited any PAID beneficial articles, I believe I can relieve the burden of my WP:GEO staffs (those I'm creating through AQfC but most are backlogged). What more I can say? In my unblock restriction, your mentioned issue was not covered. But, I respect the decision made by you all. -✍ NeverTry4Me⛅ C♯ 15:53, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
That doesn't make sense. Your initial request said that you didn't want the autopatrolled right; there is no ambiguity in Please do not give me this right, so I'm not sure why you're trying to make a case for it now. Also, please be advised that your editing restriction does not automatically expire on its own next month, that is simply the earliest time that Deepfriedokra said you would eligible to appeal it . DanCherek (talk) 16:02, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
I would never appeal for my own @DanCherek. Mark my words. -✍ NeverTry4Me⛅ C♯ 16:16, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
endorse decline -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:29, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
@Deepfriedokra: :p. I asked not to give me the right. :) -✍ NeverTry4Me⛅ C♯ 23:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
@NeverTry4Me: And what did you seek to achieve by posting here to ask us to not give you the right? --Blablubbs (talk) 12:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

:@Blablubbs: To keep the record and notify other Admins (who are here, and unaware of my continuation with AFC) that I shall not be given this right. This might sound funny, but it is posted with good faith. Except for the AFC reviewer, I have no desire for any other rights. -✍ NeverTry4Me⛅ C♯ 13:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

This is not the right place to notify, you're clearly misusing your editing privilege. DIVINE (talk) 16:18, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

User:Lightburst

I have written many articles and improved many more. I believe that I can be trusted with the autopatrolled permission. I rarely start stubs and I never add any unsourced content. Thank you. Lightburst (talk) 01:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Category: