This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ජපස (talk | contribs) at 15:42, 22 September 2022 (→Arbitration motion regarding Lightbreather). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:42, 22 September 2022 by ජපස (talk | contribs) (→Arbitration motion regarding Lightbreather)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Lightbreather unban appeal
The Arbitration Committee is considering an unban appeal from Lightbreather (talk · contribs). Interested editors may give feedback to the committee at here. For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Lightbreather unban appeal
Arbitration motion regarding Lightbreather
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Remedy 1 of the Lightbreather case is suspended for a probationary period lasting twelve months from the date this motion is enacted. During this period, any uninvolved administrator may block Lightbreather (talk · contribs) for any of the behaviors identified in the Findings of Fact or for failure to adhere to any normal editorial process or expectations as an Arbitration Enforcement action for up to 1 year. Any block 3 months or longer should be reported to the Arbitration Committee for automatic review. The committee will consider presented evidence and statements before deciding by motion what, if any, actions are necessary, up to and including reinstating a site ban. In the event that no administrator imposes such a block, the remedy will automatically lapse after twelve months. Restrictions detailed in remedies 2-6 remain in place until actively appealed.
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 21:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Lightbreather
Welcome back. I want to reiterate something I said to you via email, which is that if you have questions about what your restrictions mean to please ask and get clarification from Arbs. WP:ARCA is probably the best place; it's likely only 1 or 2 will give opinions unless there's some kind of disagreement. The restrictions aren't meant to be gotchas so you understanding what's expected is important as a matter of fairness and giving you a chance to be a successful editor. Barkeep49 (talk) 22:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. I need to think about that. In the meantime, I was going to archive older posts on this page, but when I go to edit it the first line is an arbitration decision banner. I don't want to touch that. Can you remove it, please? Lightbreather (talk) 22:50, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Forgot to remove that bit. Has been removed. Thanks, Dreamy Jazz 22:52, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Welcome back, Lightbreather. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:15, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, Andy. Lightbreather (talk) 23:20, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Welcome back
- To that same old place that you laughed about
- Well the names have all changed since you hung around
- But those dreams have remained and they've turned around
- Who'd have thought they'd lead ya
- Back here where we need ya ...--GRuban (talk) 00:43, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, GR. Lightbreather (talk) 02:18, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
.svg)
Welcome back! A bit of advice from one unbannee to another: if you ever need to vent, consider e-mailing someone you trust privately. It can be very useful to have an outlet as this place tends to be frustrating at the best of times. jps (talk) 15:42, 22 September 2022 (UTC)