Talk:United States Marine Corps

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sheep8144402 (talk | contribs) at 01:51, 22 November 2022 (fix linter errors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:51, 22 November 2022 by Sheep8144402 (talk | contribs) (fix linter errors)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the United States Marine Corps article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

United States Marine Corps is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 17, 2007.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 31, 2005	Peer review	Reviewed
August 31, 2006	WikiProject peer review	Reviewed
September 22, 2006	Featured article candidate	Promoted
August 24, 2011	Featured article review	Demoted
Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 11, 2004, November 10, 2008, November 10, 2009, November 10, 2010, November 10, 2012, and November 10, 2015.
Current status: Former featured article

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / National / North America / United States / Early Modern / American Revolution / American Civil War / World War I / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	National militaries task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force
	American Civil War task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Military history High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

Template:WP1.0

Archives

Index

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

Part of the Navy Discussion

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Extremism in the ranks

Recent edits regarding including some history of white supremacy in the traditions and culture section. Source is questionable per https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Guide_to_addressing_bias

Citing some incidence in the past of certain beliefs and actions hardly makes it tradition or part of the culture of the organization especially when the organization itself has repeatedly stated that is not the case.

https://www.npr.org/2020/03/31/824370942/marine-corps-aims-to-tackle-evolving-face-of-white-supremacy

https://taskandpurpose.com/news/marines-corps-root-out-racism/

https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2020/0303/U.S.-Marines-lead-charge-in-rooting-out-racism-in-military-ranks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.251.246.246 (talk) 17:59, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

All three of those sources seem to be supporting the fact that historically the Marine Corps has had a major issue with this, did you read them? Your argument that because the Marine Corps has taken action on these issues the issues never existed in the first place is most peculiar, can you expand on it? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:07, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

I agree with the IP editor that the content about extremism/white supremacy doesn't belong under "7.2 Unofficial traditions and customs". But I do think there's been sufficient coverage of the problem for it to be included in the article. I'd suggest its own subsection under "Culture". Schazjmd (talk) 18:44, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

I was trying to fit it into the framework we already had and I didn’t want to make it seem like an officially endorsed part of the corps, a separate subsection is definitely doable. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 23:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Some re-wording is needed so as not to appear to be painting the entire Corps with the same brush. Would also suggest moving to a new "Controversies" subsection under culture. (imho) - wolf 05:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Semper Fidelis

The article states that this was adopted as the Marine motto in 1883, at the suggestion of the then-Commandant. But why? What led up to this, why then, and why that motto? Some detail would improve the article.

The article does state that about a third of the Corps left in 1861 and fought against the United States. Was there any contemporary discussion of this when the Corps’ new motto was announced? Again, more detail needed. 24.4.136.172 (talk) 04:43, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Feel free to find some sources and add that information, then. Seraphimblade 09:08, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Mass image removal

See comments below gallery;

The Marine Band, dubbed "The President's Own"
Continental Marines landing at New Providence in March 1776 during the Battle of Nassau, the first amphibious landing of the Marine Corps, during the American Revolutionary War
U.S. Marines leading Arab mercenaries to victory under U.S. Navy Lieutenant William Eaton and U.S. Marine Corps First Lieutenant Presley O'Bannon during the Battle of Derna
U.S. Marines storming Chapultepec castle under a large American flag, paving the way for the fall of Mexico City
The flag of the United States Marine Corps from 1914 to 1939
U.S. Marines from 3rd Battalion, 3rd Marines during the Desert Storm deployment in 1990–1991
U.S. Marines conducting a dawn patrol in Afghanistan's Nawa District, Helmand Province, 2010
Two Marines of 3rd Battalion, 6th Marines engaging the enemy during Operation Moshtarak in Afghanistan's Helmand Province
3rd Battalion, 4th Marines loading 120mm mortar rounds during Operation Inherent Resolve in Syria, 2018
Marine recruits on a Squad Rush course
A Marine AH-1Z Viper landing on USS Makin Island in 2010
McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 212 (VMFA-212) over the South China Sea

Bravo Battery, 1st Battalion, 11th Marines, fight off Iraqi units on 26 March 2003

These 12 images, along with this video clip, were removed today (by another editor), with seven consecutive edits over the course of about 30 minutes. Only edit summaries were repeated comments about "sandwiches". I'm posting them all here to have a visual record, as well as a possible starting point for a discussion should anyone wish to talk about this. - wolf 08:04, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

See the MOS for images, we aren't supposed to have text which is sandwiched between two images... What we had before I edited it down was a comical amount of pictures which made this page look like a drunk teenager had done the layout. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:26, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

I'm familiar with mos:img, and I've fixed numerous pages becuase of that very reason, but I didn't have to remove images to so, there are other options. Perhaps there were too many images and perhaps they were placed poorly, but I didn't contest any of that. I simply posted them here so there is a record, which is commonly done with mass-removals of content, as some people may disagree with which images were removed. - wolf 00:53, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

As far as I understand images are not content. I considered other options, but there were just too many pictures for anything but either a deep cut or a completely separate gallery. No judgement was made on which to preserve or remove beyond layout. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 01:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

"As far as I understand images are not content." - If you take a look at MOS:IMG, WP:F, WP:NFCC & WP:IUP, I believe you'll find images are considered content.

"No judgement was made on which to preserve or remove beyond layout." - then all the better to have the images listed here. The article might be better off with some of them included rathed than excluded. - wolf 03:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

You seem to be conflating two separate uses of content, still not sure what the point of this thread is. The talk page is not the place to create a "visual" record so you should either say your piece or get going. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:52, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

2018-10-31 15 25 21 The west side of the Marine Corps War Memorial in Arlington County, Virginia.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:08, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

2018-10-31 15 25 21 The west side of the Marine Corps War Memorial in Arlington County, Virginia.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:07, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

please undo revert

There are several mentions of the marine corps in the United States war crimes page I linked to in the see also section. It is appropriate to link to it from here. aniola (talk) 19:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

You added the link to the main US Armed Forces page, which seems appropriate, but then adding it to every service article as well seems like overkill. I agree with the reverts. - wolf 01:33, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Per MOS:SEEALSO, "See also" sections are for "related or comparable articles," but not for topics that are tangential in ways that you'd expect to see thousands of potential links that could have one tangential connection or another. For example, the article on the Russian Armed Forces does not contain a link to the article Russian war crimes, even though the latter article has a link to the former in the first sentence of its lead. Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 02:28, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Categories: