Misplaced Pages

User talk:Arigato1

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dbachmann (talk | contribs) at 16:32, 3 March 2007 (→Sources). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:32, 3 March 2007 by Dbachmann (talk | contribs) (→Sources)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Do not revert the comments of others, do not remove clarifying material claiming it is POV, and do not create pages for testing

This reversion on talk:Denmark is unacceptable. If you have an issue with a posting being unsigned, use {{unsigned2}} or just wait, User:HagermanBot does this automatically. Please do not remove the comments of others from talk pages or you may find yourself blocked. Also, why was this removed? Also, this was not an appropriate edit. If you need to experiment, use the Sandbox or a subpage of your user page. This is my second warning to you about your behaviours. Removal of this warning is a dubious, but accepted practice... but will be construed as acknowledgement that it has been read, and you may not receive another warning if I don't see improvement. ++Lar: t/c 22:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Sigurd Ring and Battle of Brávellir

Sorry but i really cant find cited sources on the old version. Are you the same as User:Wiglaf? --Arigato1 23:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I move the discussion, here. Well, if you have a look at the article Sigurd Ring, it summarizes primary sources and cites Birger Nerman's book as a secondary source. Your additions, Commanche/Arigato1, do not appear in these sources.--Berig 23:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, i have read most of these original sources and maybe you should do the same. --Arigato1 10:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Og nu kan det være nok!

Du skal ikke have lov til at skalte og valte med den fælles ressource som Misplaced Pages er.--Holger the Dane 08:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Sources

I case you miss it, I don't think a website on Stockholm and a 96+ year old article from an encyclopedia quite cut it as sources for anything remotely controversial. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:13, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I have answered you on Talk:Ivar_Vidfamne --Arigato1 12:21, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Vandalism

please read the page on what is considered "vandalism" on Misplaced Pages. Shouting vandalism at users you disagree with is not going to improve relations, or articles. dab (𒁳) 16:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC)