Misplaced Pages

Talk:Glaukopis

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GizzyCatBella (talk | contribs) at 15:02, 19 February 2023 (→Polish version: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:02, 19 February 2023 by GizzyCatBella (talk | contribs) (→Polish version: Reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glaukopis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

To use

  • 10.18318/td.2016.en.1.4

TrangaBellam (talk) 12:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Polish version

It has no information that suggests this en-wiki article to be NPOV. My analysis of the paragraphs:

  • An unsourced paragraph on the aims of the journal, probably quoted from their website.
  • An unsourced paragraph about the various people who are affiliated to them, probably quoted from their website.
  • A paragraph that vouches for the reliability of the journal by citing a communique from a Polish Ministry. Then, there are details about accessing back-issues.
  • A one-line paragraph about an award by (arguably) the party-magazine of PiS.
  • A one-line paragraph about their EiC(s), probably quoted from their website.
  • A list of books published by the journal.

TrangaBellam (talk) 14:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Piotrus, if you find that there are reliable historians — though I doubt that you understand the term — who admire Glaukopis, feel free to add them. But otherwise, I take a dim view of your shenanigans. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
That said, you can add the people who are affiliated to them and their previous EiCs. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
@TrangaBellam - You removed this tag without following Template:POV#When to remove. Your personal views of Misplaced Pages editors or the public are irrelevant. I’m kindly asking you to restore it. GizzyCatBella🍁 15:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)