Misplaced Pages

Year 2038 problem

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MartinBot (talk | contribs) at 14:06, 18 March 2007 (BOT - rv 4.235.135.193 (talk) to last version by Topses). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 14:06, 18 March 2007 by MartinBot (talk | contribs) (BOT - rv 4.235.135.193 (talk) to last version by Topses)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Example showing how the date would reset.

The year 2038 problem may cause some computer software to fail before or in the year 2038. The problem affects programs that use the POSIX time representation, which represents system time as the number of seconds (ignoring leap seconds) since January 1, 1970. This representation is standard in Unix-like operating systems and also affects software written for most other operating systems because of the broad deployment of C. On most 32-bit systems, the time_t data type used to store this second count is a signed 32-bit integer. The latest time that can be represented in this format, following the POSIX standard, is 03:14:07 UTC on Tuesday, January 19, 2038. Times beyond this moment will "wrap around" and be represented internally as a negative number, and cause programs to fail, since they will see these times not as being in 2038 but rather in 1901. Erroneous calculations and decisions may therefore result.

"Year 2038" is frequently abbreviated to "Y2038" or sometimes "Y2K38" in software professionals' jargon.

Known problems

In May 2006, reports surfaced of an early Y2038 problem in the AOLserver software. The software would specify that a database request should "never" timeout by specifying a timeout date one billion seconds in the future. One billion seconds after 21:27:28 on 12 May 2006 is beyond the 2038 cutoff date, so after this date, the timeout calculation overflowed and calculated a timeout date that was actually in the past, causing the software to crash.

Solutions

There is no easy fix for this problem for existing CPU/OS combinations. Changing the definition of time_t to use a 64-bit type would break binary compatibility for software, data storage, and generally anything dealing with the binary representation of time. Changing time_t to an unsigned 32-bit integer, effectively allowing timestamps to be accurate until the year 2106, would affect many programs that deal with time differences.

Most operating systems for 64-bit architectures already use 64-bit integers in their time_t. The move to these architectures is already underway and many expect it to be complete before 2038. However, as of 2006, hundreds of millions of 32-bit systems are deployed, many in embedded systems, and it is far from certain they will all be replaced by 2038. Despite the modern 18- to 24-month generational update in computer systems technology, embedded computers may operate unchanged for the life of the system they control. The use of 32-bit time_t has also been encoded into file formats, which means it can live on for a long time beyond the life of the machines involved.

Using a (signed) 64-bit value introduces a new wraparound date in about 290 billion years, on Sunday, December 4, 292,277,026,596. The 128-bit Unix time resets later, on December 31, 17,014,118,346,046,923,173,168,730,371,588,410. However, these problems are not widely regarded as a pressing issues.

A proposal by the Unununium project is to count the number of microseconds since midnight, January 1, 2000 TAI in a signed 64 bit integer, which would be enough for the next 300,000 years in microsecond resolution.

Humor

The comic strip User Friendly mentions the Year 2038 problem in one of its comic strips.

References

  1. "The Future Lies Ahead". 2006-06-28. Retrieved 2006-11-19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. Shiobara, Dossy (2006-05-17). "Something wrong after 2006-05-12 21:25". Retrieved 2006-11-19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. "Unununium Time". Archived from the original on 2006-08-04. Retrieved 2006-11-19. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 2006-04-08 suggested (help)
  4. "UserFriendly".

See also

External links

Categories: