This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Magnolia677 (talk | contribs) at 09:54, 9 August 2023 (→Credibility bot: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:54, 9 August 2023 by Magnolia677 (talk | contribs) (→Credibility bot: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
For InternetArchiveBot matters specifically, please see meta:InternetArchiveBot/Problem for common issues or meta:User talk:InternetArchiveBot to leave a message.
Good article reassessment for Getty Research Institute
Getty Research Institute has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. PhotographyEdits (talk) 14:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Credibility bot
Hi there. I saw a notice at WP:CWNBD about credibility bot, and then read the information at WP:CREDBOT. What I wasn't able to find is what criteria this bot uses to determine the credibility of a source. Does it just rely on WP:RSP, or is it more complex? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)