Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 129.132.146.66 (talk) at 14:45, 22 March 2007 (This article is confusing at best.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

You must add a |reason= parameter to this Cleanup template – replace it with {{Cleanup|reason=<Fill reason here>}}, or remove the Cleanup template.

In mathematics, in algebraic geometry or the theory of complex manifolds, a very ample line bundle ${\displaystyle L}$ is one with enough sections to set up an embedding of its base variety or manifold ${\displaystyle M}$ into projective space. That is, considering that for any two sections ${\displaystyle s}$ and ${\displaystyle t}$, the ratio

${\displaystyle {s} \over {t}}$

makes sense as a well-defined which is required to be an embedding. (In a more invariant treatment, the RHS here is described as the projective space underlying the space of all global sections.)

An ample line bundle ${\displaystyle L}$ is one which becomes very ample after it is raised to some tensor power, i.e. the tensor product of ${\displaystyle L}$ with itself enough times has enough sections. These definitions make sense for the underlying divisors (Cartier divisors) ${\displaystyle D}$; an ample ${\displaystyle D}$ is one for which ${\displaystyle nD}$ moves in a large enough linear system. Such divisors form a cone in all divisors, of those which are in some sense positive enough. The relationship with projective space is that the ${\displaystyle D}$ for a very ample ${\displaystyle L}$ will correspond to the hyperplane sections (intersection with some hyperplane) of the embedded ${\displaystyle M}$.

There is a more general theory of ample vector bundles.

Criteria for ampleness

To decide in practice when a Cartier divisor D corresponds to an ample line bundle, there are some geometric criteria.

For example. for a smooth algebraic surface S, the Nakai-Moishezon criterion states that D is ample if its self-intersection number is strictly positive, and for any irreducible curve C on S we have

D.C > 0

in the sense of intersection theory. There are other criteria such as the Kleiman condition and Seshadri condition, to characterise the ample cone.

• Vector bundles
• Algebraic geometry