Misplaced Pages

Rasputitsa

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The RedBurn (talk | contribs) at 13:06, 3 September 2023 (Etymology: +months). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 13:06, 3 September 2023 by The RedBurn (talk | contribs) (Etymology: +months)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Mud season in Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia

Rasputitsa (1894), by Russian painter Alexei Savrasov

Rasputitsa (Template:Lang-ru ) is the Russian-language term for a mud season, when travel on unpaved roads or across the country becomes difficult due to muddy conditions caused by rain and/or snowmelt. It specifically refers to those conditions that occur in Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia.

Etymology

Village street near Moscow, November 1941
Thick snow cover and waterlogged soil in Sokol, Russia, October 2012

The term rasputitsa is derived from the root: путь (put, ), meaning "road" or "way" or "travel"; + рас- (ras, ), a word prefix meaning "discrepancy" or "divergence"; + -иц (-its, ), a diminutive suffix; + а (), a feminine noun ending. In Russia, the term refers to two periods during the year — spring and autumn — and also refers to common road conditions during such a period. Specifically the heavy rains of October and the thaw of the frozen steppes in March.

Effects

These conditions in Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia are caused by the poor drainage of underlying clay-laden soils found in the region. Roads are subject to weight limitations and closures during the period in certain Russian districts. The phenomenon was a notable hindrance in the early 20th century, since 40% of rural villages in the erstwhile Soviet Union were not served by paved roads.

Armed conflict

The rasputitsa seasons are well-known as a defensive advantage in wartime. As such, "General Mud" and "Marshal Mud" are common nicknames. There is speculation that a spring thaw probably saved Novgorod from being overrun during the Mongol invasion of Kievan Rus' in the 13th century. The season also proved to be a great hindrance during the French invasion of Russia in 1812.

During World War II, the months-long muddy period slowed the German advance into the Soviet Union during the Battle of Moscow (September 1941 to January 1942) on the Eastern Front, and may have helped save the Soviet city from falling under a German military occupation. The advent of Blitzkrieg had the disadvantage that while tanks could operate effectively in summer or in winter, they proved less useful in spring and autumn, when the functioning of an efficient railway system came into its own.

See also

References

  1. ^ Siegelbaum, Lewis H. (2011). Cars for Comrades: The Life of the Soviet Automobile. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN 9780801461484.
  2. Jones, Seth G.; Wasielewski, Philip G. (2022-01-13). "Russia's Possible Invasion of Ukraine". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. ^ FAQ regarding what made Napoleon fail in invading Russia, Napoleon -series website
  4. ^ Thiers, M. Adolphe (1864). History of the Consulate and the Empire of France under Napoleon. Vol. IV. Translated by D. Forbes Campbell; H. W. Herbert. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co. p. 243. whilst it was almost impossible to drag the gun-carriages through the half-frozen mud (regarding November 20, 1812)
  5. May, Timothy Michael, ed. (2016). The Mongol Empire: A Historical Encyclopedia. Empires of the World. Vol. 1. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. p. 65. ISBN 9781610693400. During the Mongol invasion of the Rus' principalities in 1238–1240, Novgorod escaped destruction by the Mongols due to an early spring, which transformed the routes to Novgorod into a muddy bog.
  6. Overy, Richard (1997). Russia's War. London: Penguin. pp. 113–114. ISBN 1-57500-051-2. Both sides now struggled in the autumn mud. On October 6 the first snow had fallen, unusually early. It soon melted, turning the whole landscape into its habitual trackless state – the rasputitsa, literally the 'time without roads'.... It is commonplace to attribute the German failure to take Moscow to the sudden change in the weather. While it is certainly true that German progress slowed, it had already been slowing because of the fanatical resistance of Soviet forces and the problem of moving supplies over the long distances through occupied territory. The mud slowed the Soviet build-up also, and hampered the rapid deployment of men and machines.
  7. Pinkus, Oscar (2005). "Death of Barbarossa". The War Aims and Strategies of Adolf Hitler. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland. p. 241. ISBN 9780786420544. By the time the Germans approached their major objectives such as Rostov, Moscow, or Leningrad the campaigning season was over and Barbarossa was off his horse. had not planned to fight in Russia during the fall and winter. He had stated in his Directive No. 21 that this was to be a 'lightning campaign' to be won in two to four months maximum. the cause of failure was the proposition that the Soviet Union could and would be defeated in a blitzkrieg.
  8. Willmott, H. P. (1989). The Great Crusade: A New Complete History of the Second World War (revised ed.). Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books, Inc. (published 2008). p. 153. ISBN 9781597971911. While the Germans were to blame many factors, and particularly the rasputitsa, for the failure of Operation Taifun, the fact was that logistically the German attack on Moscow was in difficulty before it even began. German rail and road facilities were not sufficient to sustain the offensive beyond Smolensk .
Categories: