This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Francis Schonken (talk | contribs) at 11:07, 2 April 2005 (See talk page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:07, 2 April 2005 by Francis Schonken (talk | contribs) (See talk page)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)A republic is a state or country that is led by people that don't found their power status on any principle beyond the control of the people living in that state or country.
Most commonly such principle beyond the control of the state's citizens is a hereditary principle, and in this sense a republic is the opposite of a monarchy. However, other variants to come to a state that is not a republic exist, for example the head of state of Vatican City is not appointed by a hereditary principle, but as this head of state is appointed by a committee (called conclave in this case) where the inhabitants of the state play no determining role, Vatican City cannot be called a republic. Also divine intercession allegedly plays or played a role in the appointment of several non-republic heads of state, for example the Dalai Lama, assigned by the interpretation of supernatural indications, used to be a head of state apart from being a religious leader.
Republics can (and ususally do) have a single person that is head of state, in which case such head of state (even if in a joint office like the two consuls of the Roman Republic) is selected for a limited term.
The nominal head of state is sometimes stripped from any factual influence in governing a state, leaving such sovereign with no more than a ceremonial function. Although in practice such state can be governed similarly as a republic, conventionally such state or country is still called a monarchy.
As states belonging to the British Commonwealth, like Australia, have their Governor-General appointed externally, they also are conventionally not described as republics, though the practical governement system of such state may also be very near to that of a republic.
The term "republic" has been applied to states that were top-down totalitarian and/or had their leaders appointed externally, like for example the DDR (litterally: "German Democratic Republic"): the form of governement of such state is however usually not qualified as a republic.
The term "republic" can also be used to indicate a lapse of time in a state's history, or to (theoretical) models for a state organisation, not linked to a real-life governement system and/or not linked to an actual state or country: for these, and other, uses of the term republic outside the qualification of governement systems applied in actual states: see Republic (disambiguation)
The development of ideas regarding republics
the concept of republic in antiquity
In Western culture the ideas about what a republic is, and which types of republics can be distinghuished, all have their roots in antiquity.
Ancient Greece
In Ancient Greece several philosophers and historians set themselves to analysing and describing forms of government. No single expression or definition from this era, written down in Greek, that exactly corresponds with a modern understanding of the term republic survives, but the most essential building blocks to come to such modern definition are present in the works of (amongst others) Plato, Aristotle and Polybius. These authors saw three basic forms of state organisation:
- A state governed by the people (antiquity's perception of democracy)
- A state governed by a select few (antiquity's perception of oligarchy)
- A state governed by a single person (antiquity's perception of monarchy)
Further, and it was most prominently Polybius who elaborated on this, they saw that most states have a government system that is composed of more than one of these basic principles, which then was called a mixed government system.
As however the earliest of these philosophers did not so much distinguish forms of government (as "government systems") on the basis of whether or not those ruling a state derived their power yes or no from the inhabitants of that state, comparisons with more modern analyses of republics vs. monarchies and/or democracies vs. totalitarian regimes are not always possible.
Further, even for the states "governed by people" these ancient philosophers didn't give it a second thought that not all persons were included: women were usually forgotten, and slaves or other lower classes always.
That the modern title of Plato's dialogue on the ideal state (The Republic) is a misnomer when seen through the eyes of modern political science is explained in Republic (Plato).
The impossibility, in most contexts, to translate the Greek concept "politeia" to "republic" is explained in the politeia article.
Nonetheless, Ancient Greek states like Athens and Sparta can be described as republics during parts of their history.
Ancient Rome
In fact Polybius was one of the first historians describing the emergence of the Roman Empire, and he had a great influence on Cicero, when this orator was writing his philosophical works.
One of these works was De re publica, where Cicero links the Latin res publica concept to the Greek politeia concept. As explained in the res publica article, also this concept only exceptionally links to the modern term "republic", although the word "republic" is derived from res publica.
There is however a use of the expression res publica that is generally translated as "republic", this is the Roman state with the form of government it had between the era of the Kings and the era of the Emperors, see Roman Republic.
Further Western development
In the late Middle Ages a number of small states would again establish themselves as republics. Haakonssen notes that by the Renaissance Europe was divided with those states controlled by a landed elite being monarchies and those controlled by a commercial elite being republics. These included Italian city states like Florence and Venice and the members of the Hanseatic League.
Renaissance
The idea of the Republic is drawn from Ancient Greece and Rome but it was truly created during the Renaissance when scholars built upon their conception of the ancient world to advance their view of the ideal government. At this period the school of thought known as classical republicanism or civic humanism came into being outlining how best to run a republic. These authors, most prominent among them being Niccolò Machiavelli, based ideas about republics on the states of the classical world, such as Athens, Sparta, and the Roman Republic as well as the ancient works of political philosophy such as Aristotle, Polybius and especially Cicero. In the Renaissance the classical states were dubbed republics, and are today still sometimes refered to as classical republics.
Niccolò Machiavelli is generally considered the most important of the formulators of a modern understanding of the republic. Instead of the ancient definitions that saw three basic government organisation forms, plus a set of usually ill-defined "combinations" of these basic forms, as described above, Machiavelli saw only two basic forms of state organisation: "all states, all the dominions that have had or now have authority over men have been and now are either republics or princedoms." (quote from The Prince).
The government of Venice was labeled a republic in the Renaissance.
Enlightenment
From the Enlightenment on it becomes increasingly difficult to distinghuish between the descriptions and definitions of the republic concept on the one side, and the ideologies planted in such descriptions on the other: when in antiquity writers like Tacitus, and in the renaissance writers like Machiavelli tried to avoid to formulate an outspoken preference for one government system or another, Enlightenment philosophers always had an outspoken opinion.
Even those Renaissance authors that spoke highly of republics were rarely critical of monarchies. While Machiavelli's Discourses on Livy is the period's key work on republics he also wrote The Prince on how to best run a monarchy. One cause of this was that the early modern writers did not see the republican model as one that could be applied universally, most felt that it could only be successful in very small and highly urbanized city-states.
However, Thomas Morus, still before the Age of Enlightenment, must have been a bit too outspoken to the reigning king's taste, even when coding his political preferences in an Utopian tale.
French Enlighenment thinkers such as Rousseau and Montesquieu expanded upon and altered the definition of republic that had been handed over from Renaissance and antiquity.
Eventually, the French Revolution, which was to throw over the French monarchy at the end of the 18th century, installed, at first, a republic.
Non-western traditions
Outside of Europe government systems without (heriditary) monarchy before the modern period are not generally termed republics. Islam, for instance, is opposed to monarchies seeing the ideal state as one where the ummah, caliph, and sharia all play a role in governance. These concept share some of the same classical roots as the ideas about republics in Western European, but in pre-modern times such government forms are not generally called republics.
Modern republics
Since the French Revolution the overthrow of monarchies has become common place and the vast majority of countries are today republics of some form. There are only a few dozen kingdoms, dominions, emirates, or principalities remaining. The republics of today have little in common besides not being monarchies of some form. Countries that call themselves republics include nations as diverse as North Korea, Iran, Togo, and the United States. Most states in the world consider themselves to be some sort of republic. Of those that are not monarchies only the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, State of the Vatican City, the State of Israel, the Union of Myanmar and Russian Federation reject the label republic. Israel and Russia, and even Myanmar and Libya, would meet many definitions of the term republic, however.
In modern times, the head of state of a republic is usually formed by only one person, the president, but there are some exceptions such as Switzerland, which has a seven-member council as its head of state, called the Bundesrat, and San Marino, where the position of head of state is shared by two people.
In general being a republic also implies sovereignty as for the state to be ruled by the people it cannot be controlled by a foreign power. There are important exceptions to this. Republics in the Soviet Union were member states which had to meet three criteria to be named republics, 1) Be on the periphery of the Soviet Union so as to be able to take advantage of their theoretical right to secede, 2) be economically strong enough to be self sufficient upon secession, And 3) Be named after at least one million people of the ethnic group which should make up the majority population of said republic. Republics were originally created by Stalin and continue to be created even today in Russia. Russia itself is not a republic but a federation.
List of republics
Currently there is a very large number of republics in the world. A republican form of government can be combined with many different kinds of economy and democracy. Some examples for certain forms of republic are:
- Federal republic - USA, Germany are republics governed by representative democracy, in which the states play a crucial role.
- Confederation - Switzerland is a confederal republic governed by a combination of representative democracy and direct democracy.
- Islamic Republic - Countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran are republics governed in accordance with Islamic law.
- People's Republic - Countries like China, North Korea are meant to be governed by the people, this name is generally used by communist states.
- A wide array of other adjectives are used democratic is common but essentially meaningless. Syria is the "Arab Republic" reflecting its theoretically pan-Arab Ba'athist government. Other modifiers are rooted in tradition and history and have little meaning today. San Marino, for instance, is the "Most Serene Republic" while Uruguay is the "Eastern Republic".
United States
States of the United States are required, like the federal government, to be republican in form, with final authority resting with the people. This was required because the states were intended to create and enforce most domestic laws, with the exception of areas delegated to the federal government and prohibited to the states. The founding fathers of the country intended most domestic laws to be handled by the states, although, over time, the federal government has gained more and more influence over domestic law. Requiring the states to be a republic in form was also seen as protecting the citizens' rights and preventing a state from becoming a dictatorship or monarchy.
In the United States republic came to mean a state that did not practice direct democracy but rather had the government only indirectly controlled by the people. In the rest of the world this is known as representative democracy. This language originates with the Founding Fathers and can largely be explained by the early creation of the American republic. At the time of the American Revolution democracy was still associated with the negative views the classical scholars had of it. It was a pejorative term used to refer to what would today be called mob rule. The view was rooted in the writings of Aristotle and others who saw pure majoritarian rule as a form of despotism. Kant believed that a true republic was only one that protected minorities. Thus some of the Founder's, most prominently John Adams, proposed that the new nation should be a republic rather than a democracy. The Federalist Papers outline the idea that pure democracy is actually quite dangerous, because it allows a majority to infringe upon the rights of a minority. A republic was thus defined as a state in which the will of the people was at some remove from actual governance. However, some other Founding Father's used the terms republic and democracy interchangeably.
Using the word republic also tied in with the Founding Father's interest in republican ideology and a number of republican ideas were integrated into the new constitution. For instance many see the system of checks and balances being based on the republican belief in mixed government. There is a heated debate among academics as to how important republicanism was to the Founding Fathers. The traditional view was that it was of little import when compared to liberalism. In the 1960s and 1970s a revisionist school lead by the likes of Bernard Bailyn began to argue that republicanism was just as or even more important than liberalism in the creation of the United States. This issue is still much disputed and scholars like Kramnick completely reject this view.
The term republic does not appear in the Declaration of Independence, but does appear in Article IV of the Constitution which "guarantees a republican form of government for the states." What exactly the writers of the constitution felt this should mean is uncertain. The Supreme Court in Luther v. Borden declared that the definition of republic was a "political question" in which it would not intervene. In two later cases it did establish a basic definition. In US v. Cruishank the court ruled that the "equal rights of citizens" were inherent to the idea of republic. In re Duncan it ruled that the "right of the people to choose their government" is also part of the definition. It is also generally assumed that the clause prevents any state from being a monarchy.
Over time this Founder's definition was declined as pejorative definition of democracy faded. By the time of Andrew Jackson and the new Democratic Party democracy was seen as an unmitigated positive and it has remained so to this day. The limitations on democracy were slowly removed; the President and Senators were made to be directly elected by the population; property qualifications were removed; and referendums and other forms of direct democracy became widely accepted at the state and local level. At present most people thus refer to the United States and its system of government as a democracy. President George W. Bush speaks about spreading democracies, and not republics, around the world. Today in the United States republicanism most often refers to the doctrines of the United States Republican Party.
See also
- Presidential system
- Semi-presidential system
- Parliamentary system
- Republican democracy
- Rzeczpospolita
- Commonwealth
References
- Bailyn, Bernard. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1967.
- Brugger, Bill. Republican Theory in Political Thought: Virtuous or Virtual? Basingstoke: St. Martin's Press, 1999.
- Fink, Zera. The Classical Republicans: An Essay in the Recovery of a Pattern of Thought in Seventeenth-Century England. Evanston: Northwestern university Press, 1962.
- Gelderen, Martin van and Quentin Skinner. eds. Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
- Haakonssen, Knud. "Republicanism." A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Robert E. Goodin and Philip Pettit. eds. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1995.
- Kramnick, Isaac. Republicanism and Bourgeois Radicalism: Political Ideology in Late Eighteenth-Century England and America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.
- Maynor, John W. Republicanism in the Modern World. Cambridge: Polity, 2003.
- Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.
- Pocock, J.G.A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.
- Sandel, Michael J. Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.