This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 84.215.119.50 (talk) at 14:27, 23 November 2023 (→"GNU Zealousy": new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:27, 23 November 2023 by 84.215.119.50 (talk) (→"GNU Zealousy": new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Skip to table of contents |
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Richard Stallman article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template:Vital articlePlease add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Archives | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
MIT as Alma Mater
Hi Daveout. You said in your revert "enrolling seems to be enough to count as an alma mater".
Firstly, please let's be correct about the historical facts. RMS was not "enrolled" at MIT. He was *working* there as a programmer.
Secondly, the concept of an alma mater means an academic institution that "nourishes" you in an intellectual way, in other words, an institution that forms and shapes your intellectual character and academic personality. An alma mater certifies and documents this "shaping process" by awarding you an official degree.
Just enrolling has nothing to do with that. Take me for example. I have degrees from two universities, so those are my alma maters. But I visited two further universities (one as a student and one as a scientist) which didn't award me any degree. So, those two are NOT alma maters of mine. I don't have four alma maters, I have two.
You can think of it also in another way. If enrolling was enough, many people who never finished any academic classes or took any exam or dropped out after one semester would have alma maters. That is obvious nonsense.
So, in total: RMS wasn't enrolled at MIT, but even if he was, he wasn't awarded a degree, so MIT isn't an alma mater. ʘχ (talk) 13:05, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- According to the article, Stallman
decided to enroll as a graduate student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). He pursued a doctorate in physics for one year, but left that program to focus on his programming at the MIT AI Laboratory.
- And according to Merriam Webster, an alma mater is
a school, college, or university which one has attended or from which one has graduated.
- I don't have a strong opinion on whether MIT should be listed as his alma mater or not, maybe we could use the 'education' infobox parameter instead, however Stallman seems to be primarily associated with MIT that's why I restored the status quo, i mean... it makes sense. What do you (ʘx and all other page watchers) think? -
Daveout
(talk) 13:39, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- "Attendance", in this context, doesn't mean "I was enrolled there" or "I have been there", but I was awarded a degree. If mere enrollment satisfied the concept of "alma mater", this would mean an obvious perversion of the term. For example, you could go on an "enrollment spree" all over the country: you just enroll at 10 universities without visiting any lectures or taking any exam and you would have 10 alma maters, just like that. In other words, the term "alma mater" would immediately become meaningless.
- Also, this is not now the term is widely understood. If you personally told people "University X is my alma mater" but in reality you don't have a degree but just were enrolled for a year and then dropped out, you would be called a liar or impostor. ʘχ (talk) 14:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Talking about alma mater, some sources claim it is Harvard:
- Although some reliable sources should be found to claim that.
- About MIT – if RMS is no longer working there, then it should not be in the Infobox, even though his connections are strong and long-term. K4rolB (talk) 09:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Also, this is not now the term is widely understood. If you personally told people "University X is my alma mater" but in reality you don't have a degree but just were enrolled for a year and then dropped out, you would be called a liar or impostor. ʘχ (talk) 14:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Self-sourced material and biographies
@Drmies: Looking at your edits , it seems like most of those fall under WP:BLPSELFPUB? I'm just starting a thread here to open up a discussion. 〜 ⠀snowy🌼meadows˙ 14:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- SnowyMeadows, thanks, but I don't think SELFPUB is a license for us to beef up (or fluff up) biographies. Like, "Stallman is a world traveler and has visited at least 65 countries"--there really is no way in which this should be in a BLP in the first place, and that it's self-sourced doesn't help. Similar with the other stuff. Opinions are great, but to be encyclopedic a secondary source will have to argue that it is. This biography is huge, and contains, IMO, way too much ... well, it's very peacocky. (BTW I'm having a hard time reading your signature, sorry.) Drmies (talk) 15:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Drmies: But the quote you are specifically referencing about Stallman being a world traveler was not from a self-published source It's from Boston magazine. Did you remove that by mistake? 〜 ⠀snowy🌼meadows˙ 15:35, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, was it? I thought most of them were--then I removed that one because I think it's too fluffy, or see the point of it. Drmies (talk) 15:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Drmies: I do agree "world traveler" is maybe a bit fluffy. But also, the fact that Stallman travels the world as a "free software evangelist" is mentioned in the source, and seems to go towards his notability. I guess we're getting a bit off-topic though. I see you've made subsequent edits that try to give an example, but I guess I'm specifically talking about the diffs above. Not generally. Can you explain the rest of these edits? 〜 ⠀snowy🌼meadows˙ 16:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- are edits that claim grandiosity and board membership, based on the GNU Bulletin, not an independent secondary source, and to his own personal calendar (!); ditto--with a pretty self-explanatory edit summary, since this is in fact common practice; and and these are unused citations, to primary sources and his own calendar. BTW I still can't easily read your signature. Please have a look at WP:SIGAPP, fifth item. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Drmies: I do agree "world traveler" is maybe a bit fluffy. But also, the fact that Stallman travels the world as a "free software evangelist" is mentioned in the source, and seems to go towards his notability. I guess we're getting a bit off-topic though. I see you've made subsequent edits that try to give an example, but I guess I'm specifically talking about the diffs above. Not generally. Can you explain the rest of these edits? 〜 ⠀snowy🌼meadows˙ 16:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, was it? I thought most of them were--then I removed that one because I think it's too fluffy, or see the point of it. Drmies (talk) 15:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Drmies: But the quote you are specifically referencing about Stallman being a world traveler was not from a self-published source It's from Boston magazine. Did you remove that by mistake? 〜 ⠀snowy🌼meadows˙ 15:35, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Off topic user discussion |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
- @Drmies: Concerning this paragraph specifically , maybe we could ascribe notability with the following two secondary sources 〜 ⠀snowy🌼meadows˙ 19:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
References
- Tozzi, Christopher (2017-08-11). For Fun and Profit: A History of the Free and Open Source Software Revolution. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-34118-9.
(Even less potent was a campaign in 1988 by Stallman and some fellow hackers to distribute buttons bearing the inscription "Keep Your Lawyers Off My Computer" to combat Apple's actions.) Still, the confrontation was notable for the precedent it set.
- Williams, Sam (2010). Free as in Freedom (2.0): Richard Stallman and the Free Software Revolution. Free Software Foundation. ISBN 978-0-9831592-1-6.
then followed up the ad by helping to organize a group to protest the corporations filing the suit.
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:38, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
"GNU Zealousy"
Doesn´t it belong in here somewhere, the phrase "GNU Zealousy". It was very commonly used around 2000, and to describe "GNU Zealots" and their abusive behaviour. (very known). RMS has later had opinions pro-pedophilia! GNU could indeed be a pro-pedophilia statement. 84.215.119.50 (talk) 14:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Categories:- Biography articles of living people
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- High-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Linux articles
- Top-importance Linux articles
- WikiProject Linux articles
- B-Class Computing articles
- High-importance Computing articles
- B-Class software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- B-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- All Software articles
- B-Class Free and open-source software articles
- Top-importance Free and open-source software articles
- B-Class Free and open-source software articles of Top-importance
- All Free and open-source software articles
- All Computing articles
- B-Class New York City articles
- Mid-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles
- B-Class Internet culture articles
- Mid-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- B-Class Atheism articles
- Low-importance Atheism articles