This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Clayoquot (talk | contribs) at 03:15, 5 December 2023 (→More information to possibly add in: be bold). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:15, 5 December 2023 by Clayoquot (talk | contribs) (→More information to possibly add in: be bold)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| A summary of this article appears in Misplaced Pages. |
 | Misplaced Pages B‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
|
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
 | Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
 | This is not the page to discuss whether a source in an article is reliable. If you want to do that, go to WP:RSN or the talk page of the article in question. |
 | This topic has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
 Archives | ||||||
|
||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Misplaced Pages ... credability
Co found says that it has become a left leaning propaganda machine. Jacob805 (talk) 01:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC
Relevance of third sentence
I've tagged the third sentence of the lead as it is unclear to me how the sources connect the sentence to the topic of the article:
- This editing model is highly concentrated, as 77% of all articles are written by 1% of its editors, a majority of whom have chosen to remain anonymous.
What does "77% of all articles are written by 1% of its editors" have to do with the reliability of Misplaced Pages? By the way, this statement is prominent in the lead but does not exist at all in the body. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 01:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC) Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 01:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- I suggest that we are supposed to make the inference that a large portion of the content is produced by experienced editors who are committed to adhering to WP:Policy and the presumed quality this provides. It's been at least 5 years since they came up with that number, and the extent to which this measurement (based on number of edits) is meaningful is unclear. This overlooks the fact that Misplaced Pages content is dynamic, with the implication that articles can be subsequently altered by editors who are less committed to maintaining its quality, notwithstanding all the implied claims that there are hordes of people to correct any erroneous content. Furthermore, to the extent that WP has a reputation of accuracy, that makes it a more attractive target for those who would benefit by maliciously altering the content.
- In effect, even without any malicious editors, I feel that there's a "reversion to the mean" because the average edit is done by less competent editors than those who worked on improving the articles earlier on in the history of WP. Oh, well! Fabrickator (talk) 05:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- That's a plausible interpretation of the study's finding, but (as I'm sure you know) we can only give interpretations that come from published reliable sources. I haven't seen a reliable source that interprets the study's finding in relation to the reliability of Misplaced Pages. I'll remove the statement for now. Cheers, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 23:55, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
References
- Oberhaus, Daniel (November 7, 2017). "Nearly All of Misplaced Pages Is Written By Just 1 Percent of Its Editors". Vice. Archived from the original on June 18, 2020. Retrieved June 20, 2020.
- Mandiberg, Michael (February 23, 2019). "Mapping Misplaced Pages". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on February 23, 2020. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
More information to possibly add in
I made a draft about this same topic (yet it cannot become an article since this one exists,) but I figured I would post it here if anyone wants to look at it and possibly add the information into this article, since my draft is a lost cause at this point. I just want to contribute into this article, since my own cannot be published. It has some pretty important points, in my opinion.
~
Draft:Misplaced Pages: a surprisingly reliable site by AriLovesTacos (talk) 04:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Ari. I see the above draft has been moved to User:AriLovesTacos:Misplaced Pages: a surprisingly reliable site . Feel free to be bold and update any article you think you can improve. That's how Misplaced Pages was written. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 03:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 5 December 2023
 | It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Reliability of Misplaced Pages. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
113.160.204.217 (talk) 01:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Categories: