This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Philcha (talk | contribs) at 11:04, 4 April 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:04, 4 April 2007 by Philcha (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This subject is a fairly large one among biologists who study species, and it was really not represented in the species article. It is also one that lots of non-biologists wonder about sometimes, so it seemed like a gap that should be filled. Karebh 02:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
I would ask, so this page doesn't get pro'd, to difinity clean it up, expand it, and reference it to and through the species article. there is no reason that the subsection related to this subject in that article cannot be improved as well. --Tainter 02:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
what is pro'd? Karebh 03:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Another meaning of "species problem"?
I just read an article in The Economist , which describes the "species problem" as "how did life's variety arise?" and treats it as a synomym for "evolution". So I googled and found pages (e.g. , ) which suggest that Darwin used "species problem" as a code-phrase to avoid attracting premature and hostile attention to his developing ideas on evolution. My guess is that The Economist's writer researched Darwin but not the species concept and fell into a trap. But others may fall into the same trap or read articles which fall into it, so I suggest this Species problem should note Darwin's idiosyncratic use of the phrase.Philcha 11:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)