Misplaced Pages

Talk:Hacker

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 101.98.109.9 (talk) at 15:13, 4 February 2024 (DAYA Ĵ). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:13, 4 February 2024 by 101.98.109.9 (talk) (DAYA Ĵ)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hacker article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconComputing: Software / Security High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as High-importance).
Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:
Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...
  • Review importance and quality of existing articles
  • Identify categories related to Computer Security
  • Tag related articles
  • Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
  • Identify articles for improvement
  • Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
  • Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.
WikiProject iconPopular culture (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconInternet culture High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nlombardo97.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 February 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
62.20.62.209 (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Gustav Vasa hade en stor påverkan på den Sverige vi nu lever i

Translation: Gustav I of Sweden had a large impact on the Sweden we live in today

 Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Hacker. If possible, please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. If you cannot edit the article's talk page, you can instead make your request at Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection#Current requests for edits to a protected page. Gaioa (T C L) 13:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 March 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

First sentence grammer error can you please change their to his/her Sugarface127 (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

It is fine to use the Singular they in prose. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I believe another paragraph on motivation needs to be added for a minor reason. One significant trend in the hacking community is not necessarily to gain appreciation from fellow hackers for the skill, but to test limits for the sake of curiosity. There have been many cases prosecutored recently in the United States that shows curiosity was the primary motivation. I believe this needs to be reflected. Crownthescholar (talk) 02:18, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 December 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change the first image from:

] at ] 2011|alt=see caption]]

To:

]

Why:

  • The proposed image better shows people actually doing hacking.
  • It also avoids any confusion about the ethics or legality of hacking by avoiding the term jailbreaking.
  • It contains descriptive alt text.

-- 71.227.138.128 (talk) 22:22, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

 Done RealAspects (talk) 13:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Hackers & Painters

Hackers are both people who circumventing controls and and people who building things in creative or unorthodox ways. At different times and in different contexts either definition can be more predominant. Should this article be rewritten to present a more balanced description of hackers, with appropriate citations of course? -- 71.227.138.128 (talk) 16:45, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

|To disabuse Hacker

being an etymology article, instead of a bunch of buzzwords such as VPN or whether it's authorized by government, or which should be separate articles of 'cracking' not 'hacking' but it was reverted.

Seems any reversion should include whatever the reviewer is 'feeling', and some type of appeal mechanism. And as far as mechanisms, that citations automatically refer to other Misplaced Pages, told on English help chat that would be self-referring that the producers' programmers of Misplaced Pages are wrong?!!


Is it that you writers don't want to be automatically called criminals as computer programmers seem to be by the offensive article? Then my revisions should be considered as disabusing. Here's a hint, capable ready people aren't going to help if having to go through months of attempting to correct something, we'll simply stop donating.


I did make three revisions, to review. Despite modern 'feelings' it's better to be called a cheap horse working tirelessly, that to be congratulated as a criminal simply because we happen to write. The article is personally offensive.

Perhaps a better infrastructure, where the reviewers ideas are reviewed by a larger voting panel? Up votes or down votes like Stack Exchange? What I just experienced of reviewers saying every wiki article is wrong and can't be referenced as 'service'.. insane.

Take the 'new' reference, a DARPA tech-transfer officer from Army ComSec, it's not a legal/illegal term, it's a methodology, hack, hammer build, versus crack, fool, scam, break. The Crackers talk about/follow/troll about Hackers, Security talks about Hackers. they are not synonyms. Sometimes it looks like instead of reviewers got some confused crackers, attacking the principles of the created site. One does wonder if they come from a disinformation campaign. "Crackers" predates Alan Turing and WWII, goes back to encryption, not a "Response to Media", please deliver contributors from those who think it's all response to mass media (those hacks).

https://www.facebook.com/Black.Eagle.Analytics.Data/posts/pfbid02rir3gQ2cd5zwcPKjmsR8dMD3zgrriXaeCWTp1jzB5jfSYcMYy2iEgkrznM8HPkVbl?__cft__=AZU1eGAhz_dwg9pboKK7kJ8CmGmh1C3ZhrpqkmtxDCX_IWLfhMS0CKRQCnFL92kvVZBiTvzG_LijBICMEL8UAnzHtG3A4u41RcOumoW_0gXrKigt98nsd3wesXonLUmi3pF5fthkXjX7z_AoVjhBVdku&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R ShaneMaddoxBruce (talk) 19:28, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

DATA
Categories: