This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Acroterion (talk | contribs) at 02:10, 24 February 2024 (move to bottom). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:10, 24 February 2024 by Acroterion (talk | contribs) (move to bottom)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Comment on my talk page Comment something on my talk page. Don't forget to sign it! Add a new comment If you're logged out of Misplaced Pages, this will display your IP address. Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Nomination of 2024 Beechcraft Bonanza V35 crash for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Beechcraft Bonanza V35 crash is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/2024 Beechcraft Bonanza V35 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Aviationwikiflight (talk) 13:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
Current Events Barnstar | |
| Thank you for the many articles you've created on current events. CLYDE /STUFF DONE 15:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC) |
Your draft article, Draft:Outline of investigations and court cases involving Donald Trump
Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Outline of investigations and court cases involving Donald Trump".
In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Liz 01:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of 2023 Rainbow Bridge explosion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Rainbow Bridge explosion, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/2023 Rainbow Bridge explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Deletion of February 2024 New York's 3rd congressional district election
@ElijahPepe: Request deletion of this redirect as page "2024 New York's 3rd congressional district special election" is already up. Check your contributions! Type db-g7 inside {{}} in that redirect then save. Santiago Claudio (talk) 02:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
PROD for Tornado outbreak of December 9, 2023
I was sad to see you reverted my redirect. I redirected it to the yearly article because a draft-article was already in the making (Draft:Tornado outbreak of December 9, 2023). I even explained that in the redirect message. I have now placed a PROD on the article and would like to ask if I may re-redirect the article and let the much better-shape draft replace it in the future. Basically, I also think an outbreak article is warrented, but the current draft-article was created first and is in a whole lot better shape than the stub you reverted back. Please, let me re-redirect it (cancelling the PROD) and let the better-shape draft get ready for mainspace. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- If the flow of information is greater in a separate article, there's nothing particularly disheartening about unredirecting it, and I mean zero ill-intentions. I read that you are honoring WP:0RR. At your discretion, you may redirect it again, as are alternative avenues; note that this is a developing situation that is garnering notability. You may also copy your content into the existing article. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- I went ahead and re-did the redirect. If I was the only editor, I would have just copied it in. However, seven other editors have edited the draft article, so I couldn't just copy/paste it over to mainspace without the article history being merged, which is a little bit of a hassle to do. Either way, I really thank you for letting me redirect it. It wasn't because I don't think it should be an article, just rather that several other editors had been working on this particular draft, so the 1-sentence mainspace article you made just complicated things a little bit. Once again, thank you! Feel free to help out on the draft: Draft:Tornado outbreak of December 9, 2023! Cheers! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- If other editors are working on that draft in a significant manner, a history merge is likely necessary. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:50, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- I went ahead and re-did the redirect. If I was the only editor, I would have just copied it in. However, seven other editors have edited the draft article, so I couldn't just copy/paste it over to mainspace without the article history being merged, which is a little bit of a hassle to do. Either way, I really thank you for letting me redirect it. It wasn't because I don't think it should be an article, just rather that several other editors had been working on this particular draft, so the 1-sentence mainspace article you made just complicated things a little bit. Once again, thank you! Feel free to help out on the draft: Draft:Tornado outbreak of December 9, 2023! Cheers! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Precious
the courage to be free
Thank you for quality articles such as Tucker Carlson Tonight and The Courage to Be Free, for articles about current events such as Enyobeni Tavern disaster and Loretta Lynn, for copy-editing and "should be good now", - Elijah Pepe you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2899 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Community Task Force
Hello I've been putting together a task force for the show community and thought you might be intrested given your contributions to Jeff Winger Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:41, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Invitation
- Hello ElijahPepe, we need experienced volunteers.
- New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines; Misplaced Pages needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.
- If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions. You can apply for the user-right HERE.
- If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's discussion board.
- Cheers, and hope to see you around.
Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)
On 22 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Key & Peele sketch "Substitute Teacher" was analyzed for its racial commentary and educational insight? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 14,662 views (610.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2023 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Apple Watch health monitoring patent dispute for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apple Watch health monitoring patent dispute is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Apple Watch health monitoring patent dispute until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Lloyd Austin hospitalization controversy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lloyd Austin hospitalization controversy is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lloyd Austin hospitalization controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 21:18, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
"Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 23 § Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip until a consensus is reached. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 05:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)
The article Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele) and Talk:Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 05:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)
The article Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele) for comments about the article, and Talk:Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 07:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nytimes.com, January 2, 2024.png
Thanks for uploading File:Nytimes.com, January 2, 2024.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
Hello, I'm Soni. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The New York Times have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Soni (talk) 02:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Blanking out entire sections just because you don't agree with others is vandalism. Please do not do that. (I have not reverted you again out of respect for WP:3RR and similar policies, but the point stands regardless) Soni (talk) 02:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Blanking out sections is not vandalism, and having empty sections is acceptable. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 02:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
NY Times
Hey.
I saw that you've just created Critical reception of The New York Times and Online platforms of The New York Times. I'm glad that you think these are good suggestion, but right now what would be most helpful is if you express that support on the article talk page. The scope and a rough outline of each of those articles needs to be planned out, especially for the critical reception article as that will require careful integration of both the positive and negative reception to the paper. There are multiple editors there who want to help, and we all have our own strengths to bring in this regard. The best way this can be done is if we all work together on this, and that we're all working from the same plan.
You cannot be the sole arbiter of article content or scope in this regard, per policy no one editor has ownership of an article and its content. Continuing along this path of asserting how things will be done, and not engaging with the concerns or proposals made by others on the article talk page has pretty much only one outcome. That is something I'd really like to avoid as you are a good and productive editor, you're just not engaging in any form of collaboration with others.
Please start engaging with us on the talk page. Help us plan out all of the articles involved, and identify areas where each of us can play to our strengths as editors. You don't have to do this alone. If we do this right, there are multiple GAs and FAs we can create from this content. Sideswipe9th (talk) 20:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Elijah please, don't make any more edits to the article, or the sub-articles for the next couple of days. Let's make a plan on the talk page so that we can all work on this together. Will you please do this? Sideswipe9th (talk) 21:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- I certainly plan to expand the ledes and would really prefer to start working on the virtual reality section tomorrow. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 21:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- How about instead of doing that, you suggest your plans on the talk page? That way we can see if other editors agree with them, or perhaps there's another way to structure the content that you haven't thought of. Don't frame it in terms of "this is what needs to be done" as you did in this reply, or "I have determined" as you did in this reply. Remember, collaboration is what makes good articles, and framing it in those absolute terms encourage collaboration. Instead you should make suggestions, ask people how the feel about structuring content in a certain way, and leave it open ended so that others can give feedback and suggest alternatives that might be better than what you think of.
- It's going to be a lot easier to collaborate with those of us who are willing now than with the feedback you'll get during a GA and/or FA review. Sideswipe9th (talk) 21:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Adding content to a one-sentence section is not controversial .elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 00:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Right now we don't know if the article is going to keep that section. We haven't discussed what the structure and content of the Online platforms article will be. We don't need to be adding any more content to the main article right now while we're planning what will become of it and all of the sub-articles. The only thing we need right now is for you to start talking on the article talk page, so that we can plan this properly together. Sideswipe9th (talk) 00:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Adding content to a one-sentence section is not controversial .elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 00:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I certainly plan to expand the ledes and would really prefer to start working on the virtual reality section tomorrow. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 21:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages ANI notification
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Snokalok (talk) 15:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Drawbacks
Was reading talk...I all read over Help:Transclusion#Drawbacks if GA is the goal. Especially point 3 and 4. Moxy-
16:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that has been noted. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 16:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- wow ok..draft space probably best to build till ready......in the meantime expect there to be sources concerns form others . Good luck. Moxy- 16:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- wow ok..draft space probably best to build till ready......in the meantime expect there to be sources concerns form others . Good luck. Moxy-
March 2024 GAN backlog drive
| Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive |  |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 02:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)