This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ĐộclậpTudoHạnhphúc (talk | contribs) at 02:03, 8 April 2007 (→Breyer Good Article Candidacy). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:03, 8 April 2007 by ĐộclậpTudoHạnhphúc (talk | contribs) (→Breyer Good Article Candidacy)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Breyer Good Article Candidacy
Hi -- quick question for the Breyer article. I see you denied the candidacy based on the "trivia" section; unfortunately, this had just been added a few days ago. I removed the section, so would this be a basis for another review? Otherwise I'm not sure if I should simply relist it. Thanks, Mackan79 01:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Closely consult the GA criteria before relisting. Measure up against George Washington as an example of a WP Good Article of standing.ĐộclậpTudoHạnhphúc 02:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)