This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pepperbeast (talk | contribs) at 20:17, 16 March 2024 (→Bengali-Assamese script). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:17, 16 March 2024 by Pepperbeast (talk | contribs) (→Bengali-Assamese script)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Disambiguation link notification for January 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Liffey Swim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chalkie White.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Did you know you removed material while adding at Ram Mandir?
Doug Weller talk 14:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I think you might be thinking of this edit, not by me, but right before me. PepperBeast (talk) 15:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Bengali-Assamese script
You've removed the infobox why? It is present in other similar articles - Latin script. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- I don't get this either. While Devanagri is the script of the union, you kept Gurmukhi and Meitei, which are official in a few states only? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well, basically, I kept any scripts for which I could find any evidence for any official status. All that I could find with any official status at all were Devanagari (nationally for Hindi and some states for other languages), Gujarati, and Meitei. I basically checked every Indian state's official language legislation. I removed the infobox because it's about about 85% nonsense. I'd actually prefer to remove the article entirely, but an AFD got no consensus, so I settled for removing all of the downright nonsense. I may still suggest a merge to to Languages with legal status in India. PepperBeast (talk) 20:17, 16 March 2024 (UTC)