Misplaced Pages

User talk:Lquilter/NG7023history

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Lquilter

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lquilter (talk | contribs) at 13:43, 11 April 2007 (Edits, reverts, and talk page: about). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 13:43, 11 April 2007 by Lquilter (talk | contribs) (Edits, reverts, and talk page: about)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is Lquilter's personal diff-log of incidents relevant to the Nadine Gordimer dispute and questions regarding conduct of editors. It is a work in progress and is not yet complete. Feel free to copy and make your own annotations, but please do not edit this document. --lquilter 12:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


Full history references


Nadine Gordimer dispute

Prehistory of edit war

  • Michaelbarreto adds incident sans race to Nadine Gordimer article 10/29 (diff)
  • 85.192.17.13 adds race & the Times cite to Nadine Gordimer article 10/29 (diff)
  • Gfourie removes race, 10/30 (diff)
  • 67.189.105.50 adds race and wedding ring detail, 10/31 (diff)
  • 24.5.85.249 copy-edits incident, 11/5 (diff)
  • 196.207.40.213 removes race; adds Gordimer's response, 11/7 (diff)

Edits, reverts, and talk page

  • DianaW (as 70.20.170.99) removed incident altogether, 11/18 (diff) and brings it to the Nadine Gordimer talk page (diff)
  • 70.23.*/Nicholas Stix (as 70.23.177.216) adds incident, with race, without Gordimer's comment, and adding in "grim irony"] 11/30 04:17 (diff)
  • DianaW brought it up on the Nadine Gordimer talk page again, noted POV, and invited way to write report neutrally without ugly racial overtones (diff); and edited own comment 11/30 23:29 (diff); and reposted very polite message on 70.23.*'s page, 11/30 23:30 (diff)
  • Lquilter agrees on talk page that the material is not notable and was being written to make a subtle racist claim, 12/1 01:10 (diff)
  • 70.23.* responds on talk page at length; first calls Lquilter & DianaW censors; alleges that DianaW "seems to hate whites, and imposes her hatred on articles by promoting the casting of whites in the worst light possible, while suppressing, based on race alone, any factual reporting (forget about opinion) that casts blacks as anything but the victims of whites. If that isn't racist, I don't know what is." Notes that DianaW insinuated that 70.23.* was racist. Talks about censor's allies. Criticizes Misplaced Pages NPOV. (diff)
  • DianaW responds heatedly on Nadine Gordimer talk page, including "There is no possible reason to add this material here that is not racist." 12/1 02:45 (diff)
  • Lquilter responds on Nadine Gordimer talk page, 12/1, 03:22: points out the incident is not notable; POV of irony comment; suggests the sorts of things that would make incident or race notable (diff)

... (not yet annotated) ...

  • 12/2 RFC filed by Lquilter on WP:RFC/BIO (diff)
  • 12/3 Lquilter revert (diff)
  • 12/4 NPOV tag added by Lquilter on Nadine Gordimer (diff)
  • 12/4 19:04 Wikiquette alert about 70.23.* posted by Lquilter; also asking for comments on DianaW and Lquilter behavior (diff)