Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zanahary (talk | contribs) at 07:48, 21 May 2024 (→This whole article is a disgraceful mess.: reply to The Mummy). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arabs article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 3 months

Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic: You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days) You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances) Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered.

This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Ethnic groups High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks: Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks: Meta-tasks: Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project. Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution: Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention Iyer Peruvian people Start an article: Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks. Arab world Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Yemen High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yemen, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yemen on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YemenWikipedia:WikiProject YemenTemplate:WikiProject YemenYemen High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Saudi Arabia High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Western Asia: Kuwait / Qatar High‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Bahrain (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Kuwait (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Qatar (assessed as High-importance). Palestine Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Misplaced Pages. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Lebanon Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Syria Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Iraq High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Egypt Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Africa: Libya / Somalia / Tunisia High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Libya (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Somalia (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Tunisia (assessed as Top-importance).

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Arabs was copied or moved into Arab identity with this edit on 10 December 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Arabs was copied or moved into Demographics of the Arab League with this edit on 21 December 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Section sizes Section size for Arabs (49 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 45,365 45,365 Etymology 5,052 5,052 Origins 9,808 9,808 History 11,268 85,866 Antiquity 16,189 35,950 Classical antiquity 14,572 14,572 Late antiquity 5,189 5,189 Middle Ages 4,588 20,591 Arab empires 24 16,003 Rashidun era (632–661) 3,451 3,451 Umayyad era (661–750 and 756–1031) 2,832 2,832 Abbasid era (750–1258 and 1261–1517) 2,705 2,705 Fatimid era (909–1171) 3,170 3,170 Ottoman era (1517–1918) 3,821 3,821 Renaissance 8,636 8,636 Modern period 9,421 9,421 Identity 3,110 3,110 Subgroups 10,094 10,094 Geographic distribution 30 37,184 Arab homeland 876 876 Arab diaspora 2,575 36,278 Europe 9,030 9,030 Americas 12,661 12,661 Caucasus 2,552 2,552 Central, South, East and Southeast Asia 5,481 5,481 Sub-Saharan Africa 3,979 3,979 Religion 10,051 10,051 Culture 1,038 70,680 Language 3,007 3,007 Mythology 3,505 3,505 Literature 8,327 8,327 Cuisine 1,607 1,607 Art 8,555 8,555 Architecture 4,323 4,323 Music 5,907 5,907 Spirituality 4,512 4,512 Philosophy 2,678 2,678 Science 18,750 18,750 Theatre 2,854 2,854 Fashion 2,425 2,425 Wedding and marriage 3,192 3,192 Genetics 7,762 7,762 See also 129 129 References 17 11,007 Notes 47 47 Citations 49 49 Sources 10,894 10,894 Further reading 601 601 External links 667 667 Total 297,376 297,376

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. ] Anchor Religion in pre-Islamic Arabia#Mecca links to a specific web page: Mecca. The anchor (#Mecca) has been deleted. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Missing region with significant population

There is significant amount of the arab diaspora in the Dominican Republic which is not mentioned here. There is an estimate of 1 million descendants of arabs in the Dominican Population, specially coming from Palestine, Lebanon and Syria. This must be added as in the map is not even marked. The influence is so high that the current president is arab, the vice president as well as his wife. 2A02:AA10:227E:5380:89F6:AA8:6F1C:158F (talk) 06:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

You need to provide a reliable source. Zero 15:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm not finding any estimates remotely approaching 1 million. The World Atlas puts the number at 1% of the population, which, in turn, is about 11 million. The background of the president is irrelevant. Peru has had a Japanese-Peruvian president though only 0.2% of its population is of Japanese ethnicity. Largoplazo (talk) 18:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Amorites

It is stated that the Amorites "likely originated from Arabia, but as even mentioned on the Amorites Wiki page, the prevailing academic consensus is that the Amorites (actually) most likely originate from central Syria in the mountainous region of Jebel Bishri. This should be mentioned to avoid creating a false impression of the dominant global academic consensus. 2601:587:4302:1620:1A6:8CEB:D70A:D0CC (talk) 14:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Whichever is the case, the language that they spoke doesn't seem to have been close to Arabic... AnonMoos (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Why Peter Webb's work isn't mentioned ? .

It should be specified in the Pre-Islamic period that the concept of "Arab" as an ethnic identity did not yet exist among the Arabic-speaking populations in the world . Arab shouldn't be confused with "Arabian" . TheCuratingEditor (talk) 17:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Era

This article used the BC/AD convention until 17 September 2008 when an IP user unilaterally changed parts of the article to the BCE/CE convention without discussion. The Manual of Style states the following: "An article's established era style should not be changed without reasons specific to its content; seek consensus on the talk page first (applying Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style § Retaining existing styles) by opening a discussion under a heading using the word era, or another similarly expressive heading, and briefly stating why the style should be changed." The unilateral change by the IP user in 2008 was clearly in violation of this rule.

In 2018, a user brought the issue up on this Talk page, arguing that "a general unwritten rule on Misplaced Pages that when an article is closely related to a non-Christian people, we use BCE/CE". Another user indifferently agreed and the issue has not been brought up again. This issue should be revisited now for discussion of the merits under the MoS.

The correct era convention for this article under the MoS is BC/AD. This was the original convention and per the MoS should not have been changed without reasons specific to the content.

The 2018 Talk entry suggestion for changing the convention is there is an unwritten rule. Misplaced Pages is built on written rules and citations, neither of which apply to the argument here. It could be just as easily said that the majority of the world uses the BC/AD convention, the majority of the world is not Christian, and thus there is an international rule to use the BC/AD convention at all times. The implied suggestion that non-Christians find the acknowledgement of the current calendar being based of the believed year of Christ's birth offensive and that those people would rather believe in a recently conceived imaginary common era that coincidentally aligns with the year of Christ's birth makes a lot of unsupported assumptions about those people. The MoS could easily state that if a user finds BC/AD offensive or believes a group that may read the article would find the convention offensive, a user may change it. Instead, the MoS looks only towards if there are reasons specific to the content of the article. Reasons specific to the article should be limited to technical limitations of the subject that would require the use of one or another. An article that draws heavily from quotes that use one convention should likely stay with that convention outside of the quotes. To allow a change in era for every article not dealing directly with Christianity is anathema to the dictates of the MoS.

The implied suggestion that the subject of the article would somehow be offended by a portion of the article that is factual and follows the MoS is not a reason to go beyond the rules of the MoS. If there is a genuine concern that BC/AD shocks the conscious of potential Arab readers then why use CE when the Islamic calendar tells us that it is the year 1445 AH? The answer should be because Misplaced Pages uses a set of neutral rules to write about facts. The 2018 Talk writer even acknowledged that there are Arab Christians. Per the current Misplaced Pages article, there are 10-15 million. Following the logic of the 2018 Talk post, those millions of Arabs love Christ, but more Arabs are not Christians, so we should change the established style to placate the majority. This is a dangerous othering of a religious minority.

It should be clear now that the imagined, uncited offense a user claims may be felt by one group should not be the standard by which an article deviates from the MoS. I do not suggest this last point I will make should be part of the discussion, however, I mention it for those that believe the MoS can be changed based on implied allegations of offense to be taken. Following the 2018 Talk page's own logic, that BC/AD should be limited only to pages discussing those people who love Jesus, it should be noted that Muslims love Jesus.

If, after considering the rule in the MoS, there is a consensus that there are not reasons consistent with the MoS to have changed the Era style in the article, I would respectfully request someone with editing privileges to revert the Era style to BC/AD as it was before the unilateral decision to change it in 2008. Shaggydan (talk) 06:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

I've never been able to understand the passion that some people bring to the AD/CE issue, but if you're very worried about offending people, then it might be better to avoid a simplistic "Muslims love Jesus" slogan, since Christians who are knowledgeable about their religion are aware that Muslims love a Docetic 100% human Jesus. AnonMoos (talk) 11:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Since the edit was made 16 years ago, the article's established era style is the current one. M.Bitton (talk) 13:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 May 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

remove text as there is an insane ampount! 64.189.18.28 (talk) 04:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done It's unclear what part you want to have removed. Aintabli (talk) 04:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Edit proposal

I would sincerely ask that you directly, clearly and unambiguously emphasize the Semitic origin in the first paragraph. Thanks. Bagyblazha (talk) 15:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

The style of your request suggests that it's not simply about adding information but about taking a contentious stand on the matter, which Misplaced Pages doesn't do. Largoplazo (talk) 12:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

This whole article is a disgraceful mess.

I tried to fix it but there is too much that can be done by one person. The main problem in the article is that the editors are mixing up actual Arabs - those who speak variants of Arabic or proto-Arabic - with speakers of the Old South Arabian languages, such as the Sabaeans. The Arabs are less related to the Sabaeans than they are to the Canaanite groups such as Hebrews and Edomites. "Arabian" doesn't mean "of Arabs", it just means "from Arabia".

This whole article is pretty laughable and extremely poor quality. It gives a very misleading view of the relationship between the Semitic peoples and their languages. The Mummy (talk) 12:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Are you looking it this as a matter of genetics? The article explains up front that it's covering Arabs as an ethnic group. As the Ethnicity article holds, "An ethnicity or ethnic group is a group of people who identify with each other on the basis of perceived shared attributes that distinguish them from other groups." In other words, it's a distinct classification from a purely genetic one. Largoplazo (talk) 12:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

No, it has little to do do with genetics and more to do with actual ethno-linguistics. The speakers of the Old South Arabian languages and those who spoke (and speak) Arabic didn't consider themselves the same people and there is literally no evidence that they did. The Sabaean, for instance, are not ethnic "Arabs" when it comes to genetics, linguistics or cultural affiliation and even Hebrews and Aramaeans are more related (ethno-linguistically speaking) to Arabs. "Arab" and "Arabian" in this context are two different things.

Old South Arabian is a subgroup of the South Semitic language group and Arabic is a subgroup of Central Semitic, as are Hebrew and Aramaic. If we are going to claim that more distant ethno-linguistic groups are "Arabs" we might as well claim that Hebrews are too, as they are more closely related as an ethno-linguistic group to actual Arabs. The Mummy (talk) 10:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

This is good information! Do you have sources relating to the topic? It sounds like it ought to be included. Zanahary (talk) 07:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

• C-Class level-4 vital articles
• Misplaced Pages level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences
• C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
• C-Class Ethnic groups articles
• High-importance Ethnic groups articles
• WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
• C-Class Arab world articles
• Top-importance Arab world articles
• WikiProject Arab world articles
• C-Class Yemen articles
• High-importance Yemen articles
• WikiProject Yemen articles
• C-Class Saudi Arabia articles
• High-importance Saudi Arabia articles
• WikiProject Saudi Arabia articles
• C-Class Western Asia articles
• High-importance Western Asia articles
• C-Class Bahrain articles
• High-importance Bahrain articles
• WikiProject Bahrain articles
• C-Class Kuwait articles
• High-importance Kuwait articles
• C-Class Qatar articles
• High-importance Qatar articles
• WikiProject Western Asia articles
• C-Class Palestine-related articles
• Mid-importance Palestine-related articles
• WikiProject Palestine articles
• C-Class Lebanon articles
• Low-importance Lebanon articles
• WikiProject Lebanon articles
• C-Class Syria articles
• Low-importance Syria articles
• WikiProject Syria articles
• C-Class Iraq articles
• High-importance Iraq articles
• WikiProject Iraq articles
• C-Class Egypt articles
• Mid-importance Egypt articles
• WikiProject Egypt articles
• C-Class Africa articles
• High-importance Africa articles
• C-Class Libya articles
• High-importance Libya articles
• WikiProject Libya articles
• C-Class WikiProject Somalia articles
• High-importance WikiProject Somalia articles
• WikiProject Somalia articles
• C-Class Tunisia articles
• Top-importance Tunisia articles
• WikiProject Tunisia articles
• WikiProject Africa articles