Misplaced Pages

Talk:Wagner Group

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jamedeus (talk | contribs) at 01:30, 18 June 2024 (Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 June 2024). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:30, 18 June 2024 by Jamedeus (talk | contribs) (Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 June 2024)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wagner Group article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months 
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on August 18 2015. The result of the discussion was delete.
On 24 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to PMC Liga. The result of the discussion was not moved.
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Russian & Soviet
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
WikiProject iconRussia Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Misplaced Pages.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened:
Section sizes
Section size for Wagner Group (41 sections)
Section name Byte
count
Section
total
(Top) 47,052 47,052
Origins and leadership 1,521 16,564
Yevgeny Prigozhin 7,067 7,067
Dmitry Utkin 6,889 6,889
Konstantin Pikalov 1,087 1,087
Organization 11,933 35,325
Recruitment, training, techniques 13,221 13,221
Units 12 10,171
Rusich unit 5,119 5,119
Serb unit 5,040 5,040
Relationship with the Russian state 23,520 30,587
Wagner Group rebellion 7,067 7,067
Activities 543 89,242
Ukraine 1,012 37,459
Crimea annexation and War in Donbas 14,696 14,696
Full-scale invasion of Ukraine since 2022 21,751 21,751
Belarus 9,716 9,716
Syria 10,513 10,513
Africa 5,273 28,663
Sudan 5,412 5,412
Central African Republic 7,305 7,305
Libya 4,252 4,252
Mali 6,421 6,421
Venezuela 2,348 2,348
Possible activities 24 9,413
Moldova 962 962
Nagorno-Karabakh 5,042 5,042
Serbia 680 680
Other 2,705 2,705
Casualties 19,586 19,586
Sanctions 8,817 8,817
Plane crash 3,962 3,962
Far-right elements 6,759 6,759
Awards and honors 9,078 9,078
Post Yevgeny Prigozhin's death 2,848 3,799
Nationalization of Wagner Group 951 951
Notable members 719 719
See also 96 96
Citations 27 27
Further reading 4,515 4,515
External links 1,170 1,170
Total 286,711 286,711

Africa Corps

This article lists "Africa Corps" as an alias for Wagner.

When I looked at the source and a bunch of other ones, it seems that it's being used to replace Wagner, not to rename it.

SlopeInterceptor 13:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Sources such as? Slatersteven (talk) 16:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Wagner group ranks 121.6.199.197 (talk) 16:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Sources? Slatersteven (talk) 16:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Should we start a new article, taking the title from what's currently a redirect to Rommel's Africa Korps?

So far, I've added a hat note over at Africa Korps. "Africa Corps" currently redirects there.

However, we usually rename our articles when companies change names. Should we move this article to the new name of Africa Corps? (If so, the hat note should instead be here, saying something like "For the WWII German expeditionary force, see Africa Korps").

PS. Please don't lazily ask for sources when it is trivial to find lots of them, just google "africa corps wagner". Here are just some random ones:

CapnZapp (talk) 06:28, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

In source 2, it says that the Africa Corps is under RuMOD control and is a new organization with a new structure. It might becuase wagner is a bunch of companies and not 1 single entity, but this organization seems to replace Wagner entirely, and isn't a rebrand. SlopeInterceptor 15:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)



References

  1. https://adf-magazine.com/2024/01/with-new-name-same-russian-mercenaries-plague-africa/
  2. https://english.elpais.com/international/2023-12-23/russia-expands-into-the-sahel-with-its-new-brand-africa-corps.html#
  3. https://www.newsweek.com/russia-new-africa-corps-hamper-us-clout-libya-putin-sudan-wagner-1845516
  4. https://www.theafricareport.com/331580/investigation-how-putin-is-taking-control-of-wagner-in-africa/

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 March 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add Asia to the list of continents where there have been operations, as Syria and parts of Russia are in Asia. IrisArgo (talk) 22:25, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done Jamedeus (talk) 22:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 March 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the Serbia section of "Possible activities" it says "being training" when it should say "being trained". AshtonWest032 (talk) 17:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done Jamedeus (talk) 18:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Logo before 2023?

I remember the patch of a skull in a sniper reticle being prominently displayed on the article in the past. Was it removed due to copyright reasons? Surely it'd fall under fair use, right? It baffles me that the older and more notorious design wouldn't be shown anywhere on english wikipedia, let alone the dedicated page. EnzarelX (talk) 03:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 June 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
TenshiPT (talk) 12:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC) At the final category (Post-Prigozhin's death) there's a sentence that says: "Wagner is officially becoming a unit of Rosgvardia...The entire structure, methods of work and commanders remain the same.", there's supposed to be "an unit of Rosgvardia" not "a unit of Rosgvardia"
 Not done: a unit is correct, an is only used when the next word begins with a vowel sound (regardless of whether the letter is a vowel or not). Unit begins with the consonant sound Y like a university or a universal truth. You only need an when the U makes a vowel sound like in an umbrella. English is a very weird language. Jamedeus (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Categories: