This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Candy156sweet (talk | contribs) at 18:52, 15 April 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:52, 15 April 2007 by Candy156sweet (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Misplaced Pages as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --Oscarthecat 20:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Richard Marx, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ~~ Vagish 20:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Richard Marx Article Vandalism
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Misplaced Pages, as you did to the article titled Richard Marx. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you..
Profile Page Vandalism
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to User:Candy156sweet, you will be blocked from editing. When you are inaccurate and you use your own opinions rather than fact, you will be reverted. Please do not vandalize my page to voice your opinion! Please use my talk page--Candy156sweet 02:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Discussion About Editing
...I'm curious to know what 'opinions' (as opposed to facts) that I voiced? The 'corrections' that I have made pertain to INCORRECT chart positions, Grammy dates and categories, etc. Also, will you please clarify your usage of - and reason for - the terms 'deface/defacing' and 'defamatory'? Thanks.
...I think you might have my edits confused with ones made by someone else. The only things I added to the Duncan Sheik page were a Gold certification, some very brief chart information (like one short line) and a new CD release. What 'opinions' did I state? Also, how in the world did I 'deface' your page or say anything 'defamatory'? That's a strong - and negative - term to use. Don't you think?
If you would kindly make edits using facts without personal opinion, I wouldn't correct them. You might also try to cite your work. Could you please refrain from defacing my profile page? It's the second time that you've done that. Not to mention the fact that what you said was defamatory. Thanks for hopefully understanding this time around. I would like to know what makes you a more credible editor than anyone else. Would it be this edit or is it this edit? --Candy156sweet 02:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Here is an example. "1990 (not 1989)..." is not a purely factual edit. Let it be known that I hadn't made the error that you were "editing" in the first place. If you want to change a year or add something credible, change it and cite it. You've used personal opinions, mixed with fact. If you just change it without injected opinions, I would have no problem with it. You have done the same thing on Duncan Sheik's page as well. I have left the factual edits alone. I hope that clarifies it for you. --Candy156sweet 03:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
The three IP#'s listed below were used in the edits on the Richard Marx, Duncan Sheik, The Poppy Family, Menominee, and Linda Ronstadt pages.
63.3.69.136 - This is an example of a biased edit on Duncan Sheik's page made from this IP#. Here is another example. This is the IP# I had made the mistake of warning you on. I wasn't told to not warn you on the IP# 63.3.69.133.
63.3.69.133 - This is the one that you'd said you edited Duncan Sheik's page with, but there is no record of that edit from this number.
63.3.69.6 - This IP# was used to edit Duncan Sheik's page as well. Here is an example of a biased edit on Richard Marx's page, from this IP#. Here is another example on the same page. Here is an example of blatant vandalism on the page titled Menominee from this IP#.
Funny that they are all from one source huh? In fact, you've made edits with one of the three IP#'s and then when they were reverted, you went in with another one of the three IP#s to revert it back to your original edit. This is an example of you editing the The Poppy Family page and reverting the edit with IP#'s 63.3.69.136 and 63.3.69.133. If they were purely unbiased and contained cited facts, I wouldn't care. --Candy156sweet 05:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Cleaned Up and Cited Sources
I cleaned up and cited sources referring to both of the Grammy Dates in the Richard Marx article. Don't get upset, but those cleanups are from legitimate sources and are indisputably true facts. Have a good weekend. --Candy156sweet 18:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |