This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Slrubenstein (talk | contribs) at 18:02, 17 April 2007 (→Evolution). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:02, 17 April 2007 by Slrubenstein (talk | contribs) (→Evolution)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
|
Evolution
Regarding evolution, please study WP:NPOV carefully, with particular reference to WP:Undue weight and to the details given in Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/FAQ under the headings of Giving "equal validity" and Pseudoscience. If you have fully referenced information you want to have added, bring it up on the talk page with evidence that it complies with WP:A. ... Aggressive denunciations of science can only be regarded as trolling. .. dave souza, talk 10:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Evolution. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you.Orangemarlin 17:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Your comments are trolling because it is clear that you do not understand the scientific literature and have not read the articles (including the linked article on the evidence), and you are not providing any verifiable sources to back up your claims. All evolutionary scientists who make the distinction between micro- and macro-evolution understand them to be different in scale, not in the basic mechanisms. Scientists have observed speciation occur. One example is . If you find an article published in a peer-reviewed journal by a scientist arguing that the Hawthorn fly is not an example of speciation in process, let us know about that article and we can include it. Slrubenstein | Talk 18:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)