Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dumelow (talk | contribs) at 21:54, 16 August 2024 (more). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Army Council Instruction 1209 was issued in June 1916 establishing units of the Middlesex Regiment formed of naturalised British citizens whose parents were enemy aliens. By August two abttalions had been formed and were employed in military labour in Britain. By early 1917 therewas a shortgae of labour on the Western Front and 1st (Alien) Company of the Middlesex Regiment was formed from the units and sent there, comprising four officers and 493 other ranks, arriving on 6 March. The 2nd, 3rd and 4th Companies, of similar size, were sent over the next weeks. Yje 5th and 6th Companies arrived in April 1918, 7th Companyh in July and 9th Company in December, after the 11 November armistice that ended the war. They were organised and equipped on the same basis as the labour companies of the Non-Combatant Corps. They were administere dby the Labour Directorate but did not form part of the Labour Corps, by War Office request. The men could not be transferred to other units without War Office permission. Men separated from their unit were not permitted to remain at base depots and were either returned to their unit as soon as possible or returned to Britain. Reinforcements sent from Britain were likewise sent straight to their units, not staying more than a day or two at depots in France. While teh Labour Corps was formed of men not fit for regular army service most men in the Alien companies were medically fir and General Wace of the Labour Directorate described them as "excellent workers". Owing to their heritage there were restrictions on where and how they could be deployed, with care taken not to allow them to work in small detachments.

The decision to send them to France was questioned in parliament by Philip Snowden MP who thought they had been promised not to be deployed abroad. The Under-Secretary of State for War replied that no known promise had been given. This was raised ahain on 21 March by Joseph King who claimed that Kitchener had made a verbal promise and a similar promise had been made to a mother of one of the men by the Director of Recruiting. He claimed the men in the units "think in German more than in English ... their conversation is largely carried on in German. They all have German names, they sing together German songs, and though I believe they are loyal subjects of the King and of our cause, undoubtedly they have strong German associations". The men were issued steel helmets on arrival in France. King feared they would be shot if capture dby the Germans. The U-SoS replied that the first battalion was formed some days after Kitchener had drowned and that no record was found of any promise he made. He confirmed they would not be used for combat duties. The battalions remained formed in Britain to house men unfit for service overseas and to arrange drafts for service in France.

1. Starling, John; Lee, Ivor (1 September 2014). No Labour, No Battle: Military Labour during the First World War. The History Press. pp. 113–114. ISBN 978-0-7509-5879-0.
2. Starling, John; Lee, Ivor (1 September 2014). No Labour, No Battle: Military Labour during the First World War. The History Press. p. 265. ISBN 978-0-7509-5879-0.