This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Z1720 (talk | contribs) at 07:24, 9 September 2024 (Kingdom of Sicily listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:24, 9 September 2024 by Z1720 (talk | contribs) (Kingdom of Sicily listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Subpages: Articles worked on · Good article reviews · GA standards · common.css · common.js
Archives as of the dates listed (250KB or more to load; threads more than 3 days to be archived by bot or earlier upon personal discretion; displayed in order of date of last thread):
- 2009-04-29 · 2009-10-17 · 2010-01-09 · 2010-04-27 · 2010-08-12 · 2010-11-21 · 2010-03-10 · 2011-08-07 · 2012-01-28 · 2012-09-17 · present
Deletion review for OggConvert
An editor has asked for a deletion review of OggConvert. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Daemonfc (talk) 04:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Dutch wheelchair tennis players
Hello there! So I noticed you deleted Category:Dutch wheelchair tennis players in 2011. Since then, of course, things have changed quite a bit and articles on this subject have grown as wheelchair tennis has. I wanted to ask you if I am allowed to recreated as part of Category:Wheelchair tennis players? Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:21, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Just for a heads up. I took it to deletion review who allowed me to recreate the category: see here Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review/Log/2023_December_26#Category:Dutch_wheelchair_tennis_players. Omnis Scientia (talk) 22:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Three years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Kingdom of Sicily
Kingdom of Sicily has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)