This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 18:24, 20 September 2024 (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Arabs/Archive 14, Talk:Arabs/Archive 15) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:24, 20 September 2024 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Arabs/Archive 14, Talk:Arabs/Archive 15) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arabs article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Arabs was copied or moved into Arab identity with this edit on 10 December 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Arabs was copied or moved into Demographics of the Arab League with this edit on 21 December 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
|
Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
|
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 May 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
remove text as there is an insane ampount! 64.189.18.28 (talk) 04:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not done It's unclear what part you want to have removed. Aintabli (talk) 04:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Edit proposal
I would sincerely ask that you directly, clearly and unambiguously emphasize the Semitic origin in the first paragraph. Thanks. Bagyblazha (talk) 15:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- The style of your request suggests that it's not simply about adding information but about taking a contentious stand on the matter, which Misplaced Pages doesn't do. Largoplazo (talk) 12:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but what is disputed? In the article about Russians, it says that they are Slavic, Turks are Turkish, Spaniards are Romance... Bagyblazha (talk) 18:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but I didn't say anything is disputed. Largoplazo (talk) 23:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- For that matter, I just removed "Romance" from the first sentence of Spaniards, as "Romance" isn't normally used to characterize peoples. We don't even have an article on "Romance peoples", that link led to Romance languages. Largoplazo (talk) 23:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but what is disputed? In the article about Russians, it says that they are Slavic, Turks are Turkish, Spaniards are Romance... Bagyblazha (talk) 18:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
This whole article is a disgraceful mess.
I tried to fix it but there is too much that can be done by one person. The main problem in the article is that the editors are mixing up actual Arabs - those who speak variants of Arabic or proto-Arabic - with speakers of the Old South Arabian languages, such as the Sabaeans. The Arabs are less related to the Sabaeans than they are to the Canaanite groups such as Hebrews and Edomites. "Arabian" doesn't mean "of Arabs", it just means "from Arabia".
This whole article is pretty laughable and extremely poor quality. It gives a very misleading view of the relationship between the Semitic peoples and their languages. The Mummy (talk) 12:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you looking it this as a matter of genetics? The article explains up front that it's covering Arabs as an ethnic group. As the Ethnicity article holds, "An ethnicity or ethnic group is a group of people who identify with each other on the basis of perceived shared attributes that distinguish them from other groups." In other words, it's a distinct classification from a purely genetic one. Largoplazo (talk) 12:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- No, it has little to do do with genetics and more to do with actual ethno-linguistics. The speakers of the Old South Arabian languages and those who spoke (and speak) Arabic didn't consider themselves the same people and there is literally no evidence that they did. The Sabaean, for instance, are not ethnic "Arabs" when it comes to genetics, linguistics or cultural affiliation and even Hebrews and Aramaeans are more related (ethno-linguistically speaking) to Arabs. "Arab" and "Arabian" in this context are two different things.
- Old South Arabian is a subgroup of the South Semitic language group and Arabic is a subgroup of Central Semitic, as are Hebrew and Aramaic. If we are going to claim that more distant ethno-linguistic groups are "Arabs" we might as well claim that Hebrews are too, as they are more closely related as an ethno-linguistic group to actual Arabs. The Mummy (talk) 10:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- This is good information! Do you have sources relating to the topic? It sounds like it ought to be included. Zanahary (talk) 07:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Almost every other article on an ethnicity defines or characterizes said ethnicity by genetics though.
- Japanese for example. Maxwatermelon (talk) 16:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Even if that was a fact (I haven't checked), how is it relevant to this article? M.Bitton (talk) 17:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- It seems irrelevant to me. It’s very likely that scholarship on Japanese ethnicity is different from scholarship on Arab ethnicity in this regard. @The Mummy do you have any recommended reading on the complication of the term “Arab” and its historicity? Zanahary (talk) 19:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Or, better: please add some content to this article about it! Zanahary (talk) 19:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- It seems irrelevant to me. It’s very likely that scholarship on Japanese ethnicity is different from scholarship on Arab ethnicity in this regard. @The Mummy do you have any recommended reading on the complication of the term “Arab” and its historicity? Zanahary (talk) 19:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- From the fact that many ethnicities are entirely determined by genetic unity, it doesn't follow that all of them are. Largoplazo (talk) 19:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Even if that was a fact (I haven't checked), how is it relevant to this article? M.Bitton (talk) 17:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Lakhmid Kingdom map
This map is misleading as it draws the territorial area of the Lakhmids using the borders of modern political subdivisions. Somebody probably made it using mapchart.net or another similar utility. It should be deleted or replaced with something higher quality. Raccoon Enthusiast (talk) 16:41, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Wrong information
This is just generalizing on entire groups of people with different cultures and ancestries that they are all Arabs. This article like Persians is entirely misleading. There are Arabic speaking people in Bahrain of Iranian Ancestry and most Kuwaitis are Iranian of origin, further more Egyptians and North Africans in generally have completely different genetics (same with Morocans most of which are Amazigh) and history and dialects of Arabic influenced by their older languages. The ethnic Arabs are those with high level of J1 Haplogroup such as Yemen and Saudi, and that's it. Actual Arabs are a minority everywhere else. Mrox2 (talk) 16:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- You appear to be conflating ethnicity with haplogroups. Largoplazo (talk) 17:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class Ethnic groups articles
- High-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- C-Class Arab world articles
- Top-importance Arab world articles
- WikiProject Arab world articles
- C-Class Yemen articles
- High-importance Yemen articles
- WikiProject Yemen articles
- C-Class Saudi Arabia articles
- High-importance Saudi Arabia articles
- WikiProject Saudi Arabia articles
- C-Class Western Asia articles
- High-importance Western Asia articles
- C-Class Bahrain articles
- High-importance Bahrain articles
- WikiProject Bahrain articles
- C-Class Kuwait articles
- High-importance Kuwait articles
- C-Class Qatar articles
- High-importance Qatar articles
- WikiProject Western Asia articles
- C-Class Palestine-related articles
- Mid-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- C-Class Lebanon articles
- Low-importance Lebanon articles
- WikiProject Lebanon articles
- C-Class Syria articles
- Low-importance Syria articles
- WikiProject Syria articles
- C-Class Iraq articles
- High-importance Iraq articles
- WikiProject Iraq articles
- C-Class Egypt articles
- Mid-importance Egypt articles
- WikiProject Egypt articles
- C-Class Africa articles
- High-importance Africa articles
- C-Class Libya articles
- High-importance Libya articles
- WikiProject Libya articles
- C-Class WikiProject Somalia articles
- High-importance WikiProject Somalia articles
- WikiProject Somalia articles
- C-Class Tunisia articles
- Top-importance Tunisia articles
- WikiProject Tunisia articles
- WikiProject Africa articles