Misplaced Pages

Talk:John Todd (conspiracy theorist)

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by 2001:8003:3fb4:cf00:3566:c6c4:e82e:389e (talk) at 03:17, 22 September 2024 (Undid revision 1226522395 by 2600:6C55:51F0:67B0:C805:A5E4:E44C:C8F2 (talk) unhelpful personal unsubstantiated opinion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 03:17, 22 September 2024 by 2001:8003:3fb4:cf00:3566:c6c4:e82e:389e (talk) (Undid revision 1226522395 by 2600:6C55:51F0:67B0:C805:A5E4:E44C:C8F2 (talk) unhelpful personal unsubstantiated opinion)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Todd (conspiracy theorist) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1
Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 8 October 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Some inconsistencies

This in large seems to impugn his character and is written less from a biographical standpoint and more of a critical standpoint. The rape case he was "convicted" in, he was convicted without the person who claimed the rape even testifying against him. Nor was she even there. The charges surfaced quickly after Todd implicated a up and coming Supreme Court justice as being an Illuminati member.

Todd was convinced that they were trying to poison him while in prison and sent many letters to his lawyers which were all collected and never sent. Then they took him away to the asylum.

It seems the Illuminati did finally get their revenge on John Todd Collins for exposing them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.228.105.226 (talk) 15:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

What about the children he molested, who testified at said trial? And it's not surprising, given Todd's history of outrageous statements, violent outbursts and sexually deviant behavior (all commonplace for someone who suffered brain damage at a young age). As for Todd's alleged claims of attempted poisonings during his imprisonment, during his late 70s speaking engagements, he also claimed attempts were made on his life while he was leaving said engagements, yet no one else was around to witness these alleged incidents...coincidence? Finally, given he was a sex offender w/a history of repeat offenses, even before his arrest, it shouldn't come as a surprise that Todd was sentenced to civil confinement after his prison term ended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RadioChuck (talkcontribs) 23:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
If anything Todd said had a lick of truth, everything about his alleged crimes could have been framed. Lokaukilos (talk) 15:41, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Categories: