Misplaced Pages

Talk:Qashabiya

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Skitash (talk | contribs) at 12:57, 2 October 2024. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 12:57, 2 October 2024 by Skitash (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This article is rated Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconAfrica: Algeria
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Algeria.
The contents of the Kachabia page were merged into Qashabiya on 8 June 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
No objection to merge. As there has been no discussion on the direction of the merge, the merge was performed into the older page, Qashabiya. Felix QW (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

A formal request has been received from Special:Contributions/2603:7000:26F0:74B0:118B:FDBA:CA81:A3B6 to merge Qashabiya into Kachabia. Please discuss below. Reason given by proposer: They appear to be the same garment and there is even a duplicate tag. Felix QW (talk) 16:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

@M.Bitton: I assume that the merge itself is uncontroversial as the articles are clear duplicates (based on the same source), but that the name of the merged page may be under contention? Felix QW (talk) 16:26, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Berber and Arab

@Skitash Do you think that undoing all changes is useful for the good information of the article? If you think there is a discrepancy in the text then you should specify which ones. Lord Ruffy98 (talk) 10:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

What makes you think this source takes precedence over all the cited sources in Qashabiya#Origin? Skitash (talk) 12:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories: