Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by ShakespeareFan00 (talk | contribs) at 16:45, 1 November 2024 (Apologies for the interruption, but this page had appeared on a list of those containing a markup error, , misnested tags). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:45, 1 November 2024 by ShakespeareFan00 (talk | contribs) (Apologies for the interruption, but this page had appeared on a list of those containing a markup error, , misnested tags)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Deletionism - focus on fewer articles and make them better; less-edited articles are likely more inaccurate: it's better to be uninformed than misinformed.
Ambiguity, in the mostgeneral sense, is the last thing needed on Misplaced Pages. When presented with facts, there should be as few interpretations - "readings" - as possible for the reader.
Opposition to political Wikiprojects, as I believe they incite canvassing of ideology; a hindrance on a free encyclopaedia.
All statements labelled "citation needed" should be removed immediately.
Encyclopaediae should act like almanacs; they should be factual, plain and dispassionate, but informative.