Misplaced Pages

User talk:EdJohnston

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JimKillock (talk | contribs) at 18:43, 1 December 2024 (→Is this an adequate source?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:43, 1 December 2024 by JimKillock (talk | contribs) (→Is this an adequate source?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53


This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Butyrate fermentation

I'm not sure what happened, but it looks like something went wrong when you moved Butyrate fermentation for @Eyele4054 -- it looks like the actual page got deleted somehow and now there are just the redirects. Unless I'm completely misunderstanding the situation, which is entirely possible! :Jay8g 06:01, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Oops! I'll try to fix that. EdJohnston (talk) 16:51, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Done, I think. Thanks for your note. EdJohnston (talk) 17:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Is this an adequate source?

Greetings EdJohnston,

Recently I was engaged in a discussion with an editor over their use of Youtube videos as media sources within the Machiavelli article, see here. While there is no current dispute and we were able to discuss this amicably, I am still quite unsure about whether or not this is correct seeing Misplaced Pages's stance on self published sources and on Youtube as a source.

The content in question

the original video


I would greatly appreciate your insight on the matter. Plasticwonder (talk) 02:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

The policy that applies is surely WP:RSPYT. I would be more concerned about the value of the citation to the article on Niccolo Machiavelli, since we are not the Latin Misplaced Pages. Someone reading aloud a letter in Latin to our English-speaking readers won't improve the understanding of the subject by most people. EdJohnston (talk) 02:50, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your input! Plasticwonder (talk) 03:02, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I am joining this as the person who posted the video. In general, the utility of original language content is that the person can (with subtitling) get a sense of the content in the original form. They get to know the sound of what someone wrote, the cadence of their style, which is lost in translation. That has utility, I would argue, especially when the person is someone known for their style. IDK if WP has specific guidance on this, but MOS:FOREIGNQUOTE suggests that original language content should appear with English translations. Whether this specific case warrants keeping is another matter and not why I wanted to comment.
What I do need clarity on is whether WP:RSPYT has relevance here, as the video is simply a reading, and the readings are from sourced, clearly indicated and verifiable material. Jim Killock (talk) 18:31, 1 December 2024 (UTC)