This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 20:11, 22 December 2024 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Kautilya3/Archives/Archive 20) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:11, 22 December 2024 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Kautilya3/Archives/Archive 20) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
 Archives |
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Tag team
I think that I am being tag-teamed against. There is no engagement from the original reverting editor (Ratnahastin) at this section, unlike at the one just above, but another editor, without any participation at the discussion, dropped by and reverted me! I cannot (and do not plan to) revert because I will go to 2RR. Upd Edit (talk) 11:44, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- I am now alleged to be a Hindutva guy; your opinions on my editing will be valued :-) Upd Edit (talk) 13:28, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Again, at ANI. Upd Edit (talk) 16:57, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of political parties in the United States on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
On Sanskrit inscriptions in a mosque
You might like this. Upd Edit (talk) 16:36, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Kautilya
I ginally understand, I think, why you use the name "Kautilya." I always wondered why you would use a reference to a 'prime minister' of Chandragupta, but it's a reference to encyclopedic collecting and compiling information. Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 16:39, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| When you see an unnecessary block, you defend the affected user. When you see a need for help, you provide advice. You discuss edits with newer editors, explain possible issues with them and implement changes after highly constructive discussion. You do these things in your free time for other volunteers and the encyclopedia. I'm not sure if "random" is the right term, but these are acts of kindness you deserve a barnstar for. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:25, 14 December 2024 (UTC) |
- Wow! Thank you ToBeFree. I am blushing... :-) -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:32, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox US political party on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Ophiophagus hannah Cobra (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Edit Request for Audrey truschke
Hi! I am proposing a new edit request for Audrey truschke. This edit will include an author named girish shahane who issued a critique of her work on aurangzeb. This seems like a legitimate edit since the review was published in a reputable indian news outlet called scroll in.
I really don't see why this can't be used as a valid critique even if the critique isn't is a historian. I'm just wondering why criticism has to come from only a historian for it to be valid. Can it not come from a reputable news outlet? Hope to hear from you thanks............... Ker3243 (talk) 00:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Academic works get academic reviews, published in journals. They get a lot higher weightage than those published in news outlets. History is a very ancient subject dating back to Herodotus and Aristotle. There is a long tradition of how to assess historical data, which scholarly historians follow. Popular historians know nothing about it. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC)