Talk:Rashtrakutas - Misplaced Pages

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Daniel Case (talk | contribs) at 06:06, 25 December 2024 (+CTOPS notice). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 06:06, 25 December 2024 by Daniel Case (talk | contribs) (+CTOPS notice)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This page is not a forum for general discussion about merits of Kannada or Marathi culture. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about merits of Kannada or Marathi culture at the Reference desk.

Rashtrakutas is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 30, 2015.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 4, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
April 28, 2007	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

This

level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Karnataka / History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is a selected article on the India portal, which means that it was selected as a high quality India-related article.
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country

Middle Ages Mid‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in to an autoconfirmed or confirmed account (usually granted automatically to accounts with 10 edits and an age of 4 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

Moved, 27 February 2024, to Rashtrakuta Empire, see discussion.
Moved, 30 April 2024, from Rashtrakuta Empire to Rashtrakutas, see discussion.

Archives

1, 2

Citation missing

Origin of Rashtrakutas

It has been well established in the article that Rashtrakutas were of Kannada Origin. It has also been mentioned that they were of Dravidian Cultivator origin. The chief cultivating caste of Karnataka are the Vokkaligas. Kindly mention the possible Vokkaliga origin. Shetty, Sadanand Ramakrishna (1994). Banavasi Through the Ages. Banavasi (India): Printwell. p. 121.:“The community of the land tillers or agriculturists was known as vokkaligas. The importance given to the cultivation of land is amply demonstrated by the fact that numerous tanks were dug and irrigational facilities were provided at various places. Some of the Rashtrakuta inscriptions found in the Banavasimandala carry the depiction of a plough at the top. There is a view that the Rashtrakutas were originally prosperous cultivators, who later on dominated the political scene. Some of the inscriptions refer to them as Kutumbinah which is interpreted as meaning cultivators.” https://books.google.co.in/books?id=cUhuAAAAMAAJ&dq=vokkaliga+rashtrakuta&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=vokkaliga+rashtrakuta Cyberanthropologist (talk) 04:56, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

That the early Rashtrakutas may have been Kannadigas is already emphasized in the article. The fact that the Rashtrakutas of Manyakheta were surely of Kannada origin has been mentioned again. No need to further give a caste designation as Vokkaligas. Makes no sense.Pied Hornbill (talk) 13:58, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Castes like Telugu Reddy, Marathi Marathas are mentioned in the article despite historians like Altekar proving the contrary (Even this is mentioned in the origin of Rahstrkutas article, but you’ve let Reddy and Maratha stay). Even obscure origin theories from Punjab are mentioned. It’s only fair that the Chief Cultivating Kannada caste, the Vokkaligas are mentioned. Kannad origin isn’t sufficient as that is not an ethnic identity like caste. Kindly allow the addition of Vokkaligas for fairness and neutrality. Cyberanthropologist (talk) 14:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Of the various books that I have read up on Rashtrakutas, this must be the only one that gives a caste connotation to Kannadiga origin. Better to keep it general.Pied Hornbill (talk) 12:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Alright sir, thank you for maintaining the top knotch article. Cyberanthropologist (talk) 14:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Citation missing for the following sentence under Architecture section:

“Other famous rock-cut temples in the Maharashtra region are the Dhumer Lena and Dashvatara cave temples in Ellora (famous for its sculptures of Vishnu and Shivaleela) and the Jogeshvari temple near Mumbai.”

Were these temples built by Rashtrakutas too? Clarity needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:578A:90AE:8166:FF8F:F57E:AA30 (talk) 14:06, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Citations not clear

There are no proper links for editors to check validity of the claims in this article for example, in society section it is extensively given that sati practice was prevalent but no link is given for readers to cross check the fact. The para even goes as far as saying that there are examples of members of royal family self immolating but does not give any proof of it. Should this be allowed? MindOfOm (talk) 03:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Exaggeration

"At their peak the Rashtrakutas of Manyakheta ruled a vast empire stretching from the Ganges River and Yamuna River doab in the north to Kanyakumari in the south" This statement is not backed with evidence. 217.43.83.91 (talk) 00:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 27 February 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 17:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Rashtrakuta dynasty → Rashtrakuta Empire – The Rashtrakutas were an empire than a dynasty, the empire consisted of many regions, states and vassals or feudatories of different ethno-linguistical identity and their region, in modern India the states which were part of the Rashtrakuta extension were Karnataka, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Tamil Nadu, Goa, Madhya Pradesh and their influence over Northern India & Sri Lanka, here is an Historian based work which shows the map of Rashtrakutas in his work which is mainly written about Rashtrakutas CatTheMeow (talk) 14:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

References

Rashtrakutas and their times.

Support This article is clearly about the state and not the rulers. Arnav Bhate (talk) 14:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Support per CatTheMeow and Arnav Bhate. The article is written in the context of an empire/state. A different article should be made or expanded upon to talk about the dynasty themselves. Zemmiphobia007 (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject India has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Former countries has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 30 April 2024

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 15:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Rashtrakuta Empire → Rashtrakutas – Ngram graph suggests that the term Rashtrakutas have been used throughout commonly, and much WP:RS refers it in similar way. In JSTOR, 320 results for "Rashtrakutas" 288 results for "Rashtrakuta dynasty" , and 17 results for "Rashtrakuta Empire" . The pattern repeats in most of the WP:RS Imperial 18:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 20:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

comment: The nominator of Requested move 27 February 2024 is banned for their disruptive behaviour to other editors; and their PoV pushing (for Kannada) actions aganist articles which didn't satisfy their PoV.--Imperial 18:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Comment: While the nominator may have been banned, the argument seems to be still valid. Is the focus of the article the dynasty (a line of kings) or the kingdom? Currently, it seems to be the latter. Redtigerxyz 12:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Whether it's referred to as a "Kingdom," "State," or a "Dynasty," we cannot label an entity as an "Empire" unless reliable sources and historians do so. The discussion on the 27th is purely based on WP:OR, lacking evidence or valid statements. While there were indeed many branches of the Rashtrakutas, the parent article should be the one that is more WP: NOTABLE than the minor branches. Ngram and keyword searches can determine which term is more suitable for WP:COMMONNAME and which is not. Imperial 13:46, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose, @ImperialAficionado I will not say it again again that you cannot destroy the historicity of a Power just because of Ngram.

See the Wp: RS for the Name Rastrakuta Empire

History of Medival India from 800-1700 by Satish Chandra. Page no 12"Rastrakuta Empire which dominated deccan and also controlled territories in north and South India"

History and Culture of Indian People by R.C Majumdar Volume 4. Page no 4 "The Ganga king Srfpurusha Muttarasa was defeated, his crownprince ^ivamara was taken prisoner, and the whole of Gangavatjl was annexed to the Rashtrakuta empire"

Rastrakutas and their times by As Atelkar"Boundaries of the Rashtrakuta empire did not alter as a result of his successes against Vatsaraja and Dharmapala." Rawn3012 (talk) 11:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Support either Rashtrakutas or Rashtrakuta dynasty, per English-language common name in reliable sources. Celia Homeford (talk) 11:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Support: Same as @Celia Homeford. PadFoot2008 14:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
@Celia Homeford I thing you should check WP: Precise.The Rastrakutas were an Empire, source of it is given below as you can check them. You can destroy a Imperial Historicity of a power just because Ngram and other things. We should go with what WP: RS says. Rawn3012 (talk) 16:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Support Meaningful. Capitals00 (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Oppose That's not how we evaluate Ngram hits. It's obvious that Rashtrakutas would be more prevalent in sources as it refers to the nation and its people rather than an empire, a state or a kingdom. Consequently "Marathas", "Ghaznavids" and "Seljuks" are more prevalent than "Maratha Empire" , Ghaznavid Empire" and "Seljuk Empire" respectively, but that doesn't mean we should start renaming them. (Because it refers to common ethnic, linguistic and regional people as a whole not an empire, a state or a kingdom). Moreover we find scholars like RC Majumdar, AS Altekar and KA Nilkanta entitling Rashtrakuta Empire. Hence I don't see how nom's and above arguments of @PadFoot2008 and @Celia Homeford are valid at all.Based Kashmiri (talk) 03:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

List

I think we are missing a list of Manyakheta Rashtrakuta emperors here. PadFoot (talk) 08:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Categories: