Misplaced Pages

Talk:Popular Front of India

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CaptiveWarrior (talk | contribs) at 23:22, 1 January 2025 (== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on1 jan 2025 ==: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:22, 1 January 2025 by CaptiveWarrior (talk | contribs) (== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on1 jan 2025 ==: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Popular Front of India article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 12 months 
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on February 20, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconIndia: Politics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
Note icon
This article was last assessed in May 2012.
WikiProject iconIslam High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDiscrimination High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconOrganizations Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 June 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Pfi was not formed to counter Hindus but to oppose Hindus and establish Islamist supremacy and to subdue others . It's written in their own charter that they want to make india and Islamic state by 2047 Abraca21 (talk) 08:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The current statement is supported by reliable sources. ''']''' (talkcontribs) 09:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 October 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the Criticism and accusations section, under the heading/subsection, "Creation of an Islamic State in India", please add this: The PFI wanted to establish Islamic rule in India by 2047 as per the NIA. QueSera1 (talk) 16:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

11 days have passed since I made this request. How do I get someone to respond or carry out my request?-QueSera1 (talk) 13:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Done sorry for the delay.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:57, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 October 2024 (2)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the Criticism and accusations section, under the heading/subsection, "Links to terrorist organizations", please change this sentence, "In November 2019, the Central Government provided Z category security to Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, one of the judges of the Supreme Court of India and part of the bench which passed the Ayodhya verdict" to, "In November 2019, the Central Government provided Z category security to Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, one of the judges of the Supreme Court of India and part of the bench which passed the Ayodhya verdict, due to threats by the PFI". QueSera1 (talk) 16:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

11 days have passed since I made this request. How do I get someone to respond or carry out my request?-QueSera1 (talk) 13:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Very sorry for the delay.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:58, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

@Pharaoh of the Wizards: I see that you have just copied and pasted the whole thing but you were supposed to avoid copying the first bit, that is, the sentence to be replaced. Please delete the old sentence now (and add links where they are needed).-QueSera1 (talk) 19:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Done hopefully got it right this time.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
@Pharaoh of the Wizards: Please remove the inverted commas and add a full stop at the end of the sentence.-QueSera1 (talk) 03:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Done hopefully it is right now.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:40, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on1 jan 2025

It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected article at Popular Front of India. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{EEp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Can you add the below para?

In December 2024, reports emerged suggesting that the banned organization Popular Front of India (PFI) was attempting to re-establish its presence in Kerala through a fitness program called Multi-Exercise Combination 7 (MEC 7). Initiated in 2012 by P. Salahudeen, a former Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) officer, MEC 7 combines various exercises, including yoga and meditation, into a 21-minute routine. The program has gained popularity, especially in the Malabar region, with over 1,000 units operating across the state. Concerns have been raised by political figures and organizations regarding MEC 7's alleged connections to PFI and other radical groups. CPI(M) Kozhikode district secretary P. Mohanan initially criticized MEC 7, alleging infiltration by communal forces, but later retracted his statement, clarifying that the party is not against the workout plan itself. Similarly, Sunni leaders have expressed apprehensions about the program's objectives, comparing it to earlier initiatives by the National Development Front (NDF). Despite these allegations, MEC 7 organizers assert that the program is an inclusive health initiative open to individuals of all backgrounds, aiming solely at promoting health and fitness. They emphasize the involvement of retired military, police, and judicial personnel in the program. Notably, Congress MP V. K. Sreekandan has defended MEC 7, describing it as a beneficial fitness program that transcends caste, religious, or political biases. In light of the controversy, central intelligence agencies have reportedly initiated investigations into MEC 7 to assess the veracity of the alleged extremist links. The Statesman The situation remains dynamic, with ongoing debates about the true nature and intentions of MEC 7 in Kerala. CaptiveWarrior (talk) 23:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

  1. Ramdas, P (26 June 2024). "PFI wanted to establish Islamic rule in India by 2047: NIA". The New Indian Express. Retrieved 2 October 2024.
  2. https://www.onmanorama.com/news/kerala/2024/12/15/mec7-criticism-withdrawn-cpm-kozhikode-district-secretary-p-mohanan-communal-forces-agenda.html
  3. https://www.thestatesman.com/india/kerala-leader-clarifies-stand-on-mec-7-amidst-controversy-1503376209.html
  4. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/kerala/congress-mp-sreekandan-backs-controversial-mec-7-exercise-routine-linked-to-banned-islamist-outfit-pfi-3318581
Categories: