Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Randykitty (talk | contribs) at 09:22, 2 January 2025 (→CNRS: typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I am on an extended wikibreak and will be much less online than usual (if at all). If you need an admin, please go to WP:AN. If you came here because I speedily deleted an article, please see WP:REFUND first. If you have questions/problems concerning academic journals, Headbomb is very knowledgeable on this subject and always very helpful. Thanks.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hi, and welcome to my User Talk page! For new discussions, please add your comments at the very bottom and use a section heading (e.g., by using the "+" tab, or, depending on your settings, the "new section" tab at the top of this page). I will respond on this page unless specifically requested otherwise. I dislike talk-back templates and fragmented discussions. If I post on your page you may assume that I will watch it for a response. If you post here I will assume the same (and that you lost interest if you stop following the discussion).

Reversion of page change by Journal Editor

Hello - I'm not sure what happened, but I'm the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Operations Management. In an effort to make the most current information about the Journal available I added direct links to our official journal page that we manage: www.jom-hub.com . However, these changes were undone. As EiC I assure you that this www.jom-hub.com is the official site. Indeed if you go to the Wiley site for the Journal, you will see a prominent link to www.jom-hub.com I'm not sure what else can be said to assure Misplaced Pages of this. There is no one higher than the EiCs on this question. Bendoly (talk) 16:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

• Hi, I see on your talk page that you have been advised that you should disclose your COI and how to do that (years ago, in fact). As for the website, I have changed that, I went a bit too fast when I looked at the Wiley page. I did again remove that one sentence with an inappropriate in-text external link. The way websites are presented now make this lin unnecessary. As for your suggestion in one of your edit summaries of a phone call with "Misplaced Pages", that won't happen. As a management specialist you should know by now that WP is decentralized and basically a functioning anarchy. There's no way to contact WP, only individual editors (and in case of conflicts, noticeboards like WP:ANI). --Randykitty (talk) 17:07, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 1 § Establishments in Iran, pre-1935

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 1 § Establishments in Iran, pre-1935 on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

CNRS

How about you give a valid reason for this? Ombreux (talk) 15:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

• And a Happy New Year to you, too! While I appreciate your effort to improve the CNRS article, the sad reality is that nobody pays any attention to those SCImago rankings: not journals, not publishers, and not any universities or research organizations. I bet that not even the CNRS themselves have given this any attention, but even if they did, it wouldn't change the fact that SCImago for all purposes is trivial. Hope this explains. --Randykitty (talk) 20:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)