Misplaced Pages

Talk:Cossack Hetmanate

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 14:45, 5 January 2025 (Archiving 19 discussion(s) to Talk:Cossack Hetmanate/Archive 3, Talk:Cossack Hetmanate/Archive 1, Talk:Cossack Hetmanate/Archive 2) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 14:45, 5 January 2025 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 19 discussion(s) to Talk:Cossack Hetmanate/Archive 3, Talk:Cossack Hetmanate/Archive 1, Talk:Cossack Hetmanate/Archive 2) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cossack Hetmanate article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 12 months 
This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconFormer countries (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesFormer countries
WikiProject iconUkraine Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fiefdom of Poland

@Joaziela: please add citations for this to the body, as far as i can tell none of the sources here or in Treaty of Zboriv support that it was a Polish fife—blindlynx 16:57, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 September 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

the status page in the right shouldn't exist because its not true so will you please remove it? Dan69182 (talk) 14:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Tollens (talk) 19:35, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

the protectorate is wrong

as the treaty of pereyaslav was signed in 1654 to help the cossack 

hetmanate to not fight the commonwealth. on 24 october 1656 russia made a treaty with poland and khmelnytsky said that russia violated the treaty so he broke the treaty of pereyaslav and joined a coalition with Sweden Dan69182 (talk) 09:39, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

My revert

I reverted massive changes that included removal big referenced chunks with unconvincing edit summaries such as "Most of it was wrong so i decided to delete it for the better" and addition of large unreferenced pieces. Please explain your deletions here, in article talk page. - Altenmann >talk 16:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Use of the blue and yellow version

I invite the people who watch this page to take part in the following discussion:Talk:Cossack with musket#Use of the blue and yellow version--Raimundo57br (talk) 03:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC).

Categories: