Misplaced Pages

Autobiographic Elements in Latin Inscriptions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GeorgiaHuman (talk | contribs) at 02:55, 12 January 2025 (added infobox). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:55, 12 January 2025 by GeorgiaHuman (talk | contribs) (added infobox)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Autobiographic Elements in Latin Inscriptions
AuthorHenry Herbert Armstrong
LanguageEnglish
PublisherThe MacMillan Company
Publication date1910
Publication placeUnited States

Autobiographic Elements in Latin Inscriptions is a 1910 book by Henry Herbert Armstrong, published by The MacMillan Company.

Content

The book is an academic text describing autobiographic elements of Latin inscriptions from ancient Rome.

Reception

S. R. reviewed the book in Revue Archéologique, a French archaeological journal. W. H. D. Rouse reviewed the book in The Classical Review, writing that the book "must have cost an enourmous labour; but something human emerges" and that "Armstrong includes even the fictious personification where the object is supposed to address the reader, this is to extend the idea of autobiography. His essay is rather a study of formulae; for with so a wide a conception of the subject, there is not room to give many texts." Johannes Tolkiehn reviewed the book for The Classical Quarterly, writing that book was "On the whole a delightful production, though the net is cast rather too widely."

References

  1. Armstrong, Henry Herbert (1910). Autobiographic Elements in Latin Inscriptions. New York: The MacMillan Company.
  2. Revue Archéologique, Quatrième Série, T. 17 (Janvier-Juin 1911), p. 364
  3. The Classical Review, Vol. 25, No. 4 (Jun., 1911), pp. 123-124
  4. The Classical Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 2 (Apr., 1911), pp. 126-136