Misplaced Pages

:Requests for page protection/Increase - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Favonian (talk | contribs) at 10:34, 13 January 2025 (UI (film): added signature). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 10:34, 13 January 2025 by Favonian (talk | contribs) (UI (film): added signature)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection

UI (film)

Semi-protection: Required Semi protect atleast for a month, Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users and other registered editors — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musamar (talkcontribs) 09:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Calito Soul

Reason: High level of Sockpuppetry of User:Alon9393 IPs trying to AFD the article. Protoeus (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 190.219.101.128/25 (talk · contribs) blocked by Izno. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Henry Oaminal

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent disruptive editing and WP:COI. New editors continually remove controversial sections and replace them with positive but unsourced information. The article was protected two months ago for this reason but expired three weeks ago. Annh07 (talk) 04:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:08, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Riize

Indefinite semi-protection: Requesting pending changes protection due to long-term persistent disruptive editing. RachelTensions (talk) 05:35, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:VRT noticeboard

Semi protection: Persistent IP block evasion by MAB. ~SG5536B 08:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator David Eppstein. Favonian (talk) 09:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 08:42, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 09:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2-methylbutane is tasty (talk · contribs) blocked by EPIC. Locked, actually. Favonian (talk) 09:53, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Kanji Swami

Reason: High 'edit warring' activity. Other users involved are not cooperating and discussing on the talk page despite multiple requests to do so. Protection necessary for a while at least. ParvatPrakash (talk) 09:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: High level of vandalism and Edit warring by probable sock puppet users already under investigation. Addition of unrealiable sourced content. Livingstonshr (talk) 09:28, 13 January 2025 (UTC) Livingstonshr (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The alternative would have been to block both of you for edit-warring. Favonian (talk) 10:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Post-postmodernism

Reason: Full protection: Frequent removal of the page content Post-postmodernism is a neo-trend and it needs a special care. Few scholars are active in this field, and researchers who wish to do research in this field need to see the active scholars and publications. I suggest that all scholars who had been mentioned on the page are re-added and protected. Supporter33 (talk) 09:40, 13 January 2025 (UTC)