This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Favonian (talk | contribs) at 10:34, 13 January 2025 (→UI (film): added signature). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:34, 13 January 2025 by Favonian (talk | contribs) (→UI (film): added signature)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) ShortcutsPlace requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Requests for page protection | |
---|---|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". |
UI (film)
Semi-protection: Required Semi protect atleast for a month, Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users and other registered editors — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musamar (talk • contribs) 09:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Calito Soul
Reason: High level of Sockpuppetry of User:Alon9393 IPs trying to AFD the article. Protoeus (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 190.219.101.128/25 (talk · contribs) blocked by Izno. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Henry Oaminal
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent disruptive editing and WP:COI. New editors continually remove controversial sections and replace them with positive but unsourced information. The article was protected two months ago for this reason but expired three weeks ago. Annh07 (talk) 04:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:08, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Riize
Indefinite semi-protection: Requesting pending changes protection due to long-term persistent disruptive editing. RachelTensions (talk) 05:35, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages talk:VRT noticeboard
Semi protection: Persistent IP block evasion by MAB. ~SG5536B 08:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—Talk to my owner:Online 08:48, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator David Eppstein. Favonian (talk) 09:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard
- Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 08:42, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism
- Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 09:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2-methylbutane is tasty (talk · contribs) blocked by EPIC. Locked, actually. Favonian (talk) 09:53, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Kanji Swami
Reason: High 'edit warring' activity. Other users involved are not cooperating and discussing on the talk page despite multiple requests to do so. Protection necessary for a while at least. ParvatPrakash (talk) 09:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
+1 Reason: High level of vandalism and Edit warring by probable sock puppet users already under investigation. Addition of unrealiable sourced content. Livingstonshr (talk) 09:28, 13 January 2025 (UTC) Livingstonshr (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The alternative would have been to block both of you for edit-warring. Favonian (talk) 10:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Post-postmodernism
Reason: Full protection: Frequent removal of the page content Post-postmodernism is a neo-trend and it needs a special care. Few scholars are active in this field, and researchers who wish to do research in this field need to see the active scholars and publications. I suggest that all scholars who had been mentioned on the page are re-added and protected. Supporter33 (talk) 09:40, 13 January 2025 (UTC)