Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 80.201.19.94 (talk) at 08:57, 5 May 2007 (→your "Please stop cyberbullying newcomers" thread). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments; this is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Hu12 13:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

sock accounts

217.136.93.7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
80.201.26.155 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
80.201.19.94 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 14:05, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

your "Please stop cyberbullying newcomers" thread

Hello 80.201.19.94. You don't get to insert a new thread in the middle like you did here . Either re-attach it back to the thread it was part of or move it to the end. I'll give you 30 minutes then I'll clean it up myself if you didn't already. I'll reply to you then too. Just curious, how many threads do you plan on starting on my talk page? (Requestion 21:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC))

I did as You wanted. But Dont expect too much kindness from someone whose contributions you have destroyed. If You do not want this to escalate any further be reasonable, end help me to restore all the legitimate contributions You vandalised, and revert your calls for blacklisting.

--80.201.19.94 22:08, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

"Internal spamming" and "cross-posting" constitutes disruptive canvassing and is never acceptable. Please cease this behavior.--Hu12 23:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the avertissement to a newbe. However I think an "I" in stead of a "hand" would have been more apppropriate. Is it canvassing to contact two users who were victims of the same vandal ? see: canvassing: An arbitrator clarified the position: "Briefly, I think a reasonable amount of communication about issues is fine. Aggressive propaganda campaigns are not. The difference lies in the disruption involved. If what is happening is getting everyone upset then it is a problem. Often the dividing line is crossed when you are contacting a number of people who do not ordinarily edit the disputed article."

--80.201.19.94 08:56, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. (WHOIS  Geolocate  Proxy Checker Current blocks XTools Global contributions) (RIRs: Africa America Asia-Pacific Europe Latin America/Caribbean)