Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Daniel (talk | contribs) at 10:38, 19 May 2007 (+). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Daniel/Userpage/Header/Icons User:Daniel/Userpage/Header User:Daniel/Userpage/TalkLayout

Quick thanks

Hey, Daniel; I see you've jumped on the WP:CHU/WP:CHU/U bandwagon as well ;) I'd just like to say a quick (belated) thanks for your help at Portal:Scotland - I really couldn't have done it without you, and your effort was paramount to the lovely gold star at the top of the page.

Have a good one!

Regards,
Anthony 16:21, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

No problems :) Daniel 04:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Mediation nomination

I've been speaking with Chad, and he's wished me luck with the nomination, so I'd assume that the matter is settled?

Anthøny 23:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey; are you around IRC? Just need a quick word ~ Anthøny 23:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

I pinged you about 2mins ago :) Daniel 23:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Apologies, I'm on as a slightly different nick: anthony_cfc ~ Anthøny 23:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about running out before - umpiring duties. I've removed my note, as Chad has nuked the rule. Cheers, Daniel 04:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

CCM

Ah, ok, that makes sense. if it flips back, no probs. President and Chairman are functionally the same in any case... :) Dibo 08:41, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Still working on fixing it... Daniel 10:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: New name

Thanks :)

Congratulations on yours too. You've joined the likes of Madonna, Cher...and Sarah and Riana :D--cj | talk 09:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

And Mark...basically, the people at the top of the Aussie Cabal :) Daniel 10:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Achiving a discussion less than an hour old

Surely it can't be right to 'archive' discussions about admin conduct that are under an hour old? I don't see many other 'archived' discussions on that talk page, and those that are have been far more thoroughly discussed.--Nydas 10:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't think you've bothered to read my closing comment. When you have, and believe you have a rebuttal to it, please come back and reply with an actual argument. And, please read the instructions at the top of WP:ANI. Daniel 10:12, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Follow-up

Would you happen to know why my application for Vandal Proof was rejected again? Eleos 10:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

No idea, Betacommand is the person to ask, so you're going to have to wait for a response from him. Note that I said "we blanket-decline anyone with less than 250 edits", not "we accept anyone with more than 250 edits". As moderators appointed by the sole controller of the application, Daniel Cannon, we have been told to a) apply discretion and b) apply this discretion in a way which will protect the application from misuse. Obviously Betacommand has decided that you still don't meet the needed requirements, and that's for him to explain. Daniel 10:38, 19 May 2007 (UTC)