This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Beneaththelandslide (talk | contribs) at 05:45, 22 May 2007 (→Newcomer: comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:45, 22 May 2007 by Beneaththelandslide (talk | contribs) (→Newcomer: comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
|
Re: Hi
I replied to your question on my talk page. +A.0u 01:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Harakat
Hello Perspicacite, I don't think I'm the best person to ask as I can't read or write Arabic script, but my understanding of the Misplaced Pages style guidelines is that the extra strokes to indicate the vowel sounds are not usually written in Arabic script, and thus are not included here. I would recommend you ask User:Anas_Salloum, he's very well versed in such topics. Regards, -- Jeff3000 02:02, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Srebrenica massacre
Our article on the Srebrenica massacre has seen lots of discussion because it is a controversial subject. As you noticed, any edits you (or anybody else) make without giving a clear explanation of your reasoning are likely to be deleted. Please leave a comment on the talk page giving the reasons for the edits that you want to make. Thanks, Jitse Niesen (talk) 02:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Zimbabwe articles
Thanks for all your copyedits to Zimbabwe history articles. Wizzy…☎ 08:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Ahrn Palley
The sources listed at the bottom of the article are the sources I actually used to write the article. Stop tagging as unreferenced an article which plainly is, it's testing my patience. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 20:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- I see your latest gem is to remove the fact that the Presidential election result in Zimbabwe Rhodesia was reported in the Daily Telegraph of 29 May 1979 and then describe this as unsourced. As a matter of fact I think a better source is the Journals of the House of Assembly although I can't remember which page exactly. But I doubt you've ever looked through every page of the Journals of the House of Assembly of Zimbabwe-Rhodesia and every page of the Official Report of Debates to source articles, as I have because you'd rather spend your time tagging sourced items as unsourced. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 21:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Newcomer
You seem relatively new to Misplaced Pages. A few things:
- tags are immensely irritating. You could throw them into the most referenced article there is, but all they do is clog it up.
- Footnotes are ideal, especially for larger articles. But references, without specified page numbers, are fine. You cannot claim an article to be unreferenced when the references are listed, but aren't in footnote form.
- Key Misplaced Pages policy: Misplaced Pages:Ignore all rules. Common sense should override policy where appropriate; there is no reason to mindlessly adhere to dogma when, in certain situations, it just doesn't help improve the encylopedia.
If you need any help, ask. But please realise that some editors here (like Fys) have been putting in for years, have contributed tens of thousands of words, and do not like seeing their hard work mangled due to a blind adherence to a particular interpretation of "policy".
Best wishes, michael 05:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's not "wikistalking" (a loose, undefined and farcical concept). It's me having the items on my watchlist, noting the changes, and seeing about fixing them. Again, there is no need to meddle with articles. How about actually getting some books, sitting down, and writing one? Much better than removing references, adding countless fact tags, making articles harder to read, and irritating experienced users who enjoy writing for Misplaced Pages and shouldn't have to put up with recalcitrants. michael 05:34, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- I can't wait to tuck into the articles on Mugabe and the 'Front and turn them into FA's. Perhaps Palley too. You've inspired me. (regards civility, hm? I'm not one for ass kissing, or blowing smoke up it, or adding fairy padding to my words. Straight and blunt: the way I like it. Much better than being a conceited snake who pretends to be civil for show) michael 05:45, 22 May 2007 (UTC)