This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tvoz (talk | contribs) at 09:05, 23 May 2007 (you have violated 3RR after being warned). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:05, 23 May 2007 by Tvoz (talk | contribs) (you have violated 3RR after being warned)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Please do not delete content from articles on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Ron Paul. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Misplaced Pages:Sandbox for test edits. Go to the talk page if you have a problem with the article - do not just remove sections. This is a neutral encyclopedia, not a Ron Paul campaign arm. Tvoz |talk 21:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
I agree with the deletion of this section on the grounds that it is being given way more space than it deserves. These are allegations and as such it is a clear unbridled attempt to slander a man with someone else's words. If mentioned at all it deserves no more that two or three sentences at most. This is an unfair attack on this candidate and it is now consuming a significant portion of the total page. Absolutely rediculous! Anappealtoheaven 03:12, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- If you feel that way, discuss it on Talk. Edit warring is not going to do it. Tvoz |talk 09:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ron Paul. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Was there something about the previous warning that you didn't understand? Stop removing this text. Tvoz |talk 00:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Sorry that you've ignored the warnings and refused to discuss this or even leave an edit summary explanation. Edit warring is not the way to accomplish something on wikipedia. Try persuasion, logic, discussion, compromise. Tvoz |talk 09:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)