Misplaced Pages

User talk:Useight

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Useight (talk | contribs) at 06:23, 7 June 2007 (Users to Watch). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 06:23, 7 June 2007 by Useight (talk | contribs) (Users to Watch)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Tags For Deletion

  • db-bio is for bio about person, group, etc
  • subst:prod|reason is for other possible deletions
  • db-nocontext is for no context
  • db-spam is for blatant advertising
  • db-inc is for a company with no importance
  • db-nonsense is for pages about nothing
  • db|any text
  • db-attack is for slanderous remarks
  • db-vandalism is for pure vandalism
  • db-test is for a test pages
  • db-nocontent is for blank pages

Other Tags

  • ] to make a link different than its text

To use on talk pages of vandals:

Pages I've Made

Useful Links

Questions When Becoming Admin

  • What admin work do you intend to take part in?
  • What are your best contributions to Misplaced Pages, and why?
  • Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

Articles To Note

Users to Watch

  • Jdubquestus --6/5/07--
  • DIALLOG PK --6/5/07--
  • Jonbonjonni --6/5/07--
  • Tyminator --6/6/07--
  • Tpcmarketing --6/6/07--
  • Manjukirans --6/7/07--
  • ‎Laser10101010101010101010 --6/7/07--

Block

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. Nunh-huh 18:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Useight, The vandalism in question was using an attack page for chatting, specifically is matt gay. If you still think there's been an error, please let me know. Nunh-huh 19:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC) I've removed it on the basis that I may have misread your intent. Feel free to delete this once you've read it.- Nunh-huh 19:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

  • It appears there's been a misunderstanding... per the deleted page log, the only activity User:Useight has had on the article was tagging it with a {{db-attack}} tag; the other two blocked users in the edit history of this page actually did use the page as an attack chat board as such. I'm going ahead and reversing the block on this basis. --Kinu /c 19:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Your unblock is hardly necessary, since I've already unblocked him. (see the text directly above yours). - Nunh-huh 19:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
I didn't see it in the log so I wasn't aware that you had. --Kinu /c 19:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
It doesn't hurt to be unblocked twice, I suppose. My apologies, btw, to Useight, for having misunderstood his contribution to that page. - Nunh-huh 19:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
checkY

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of I was blocked by mistake lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Nunh-huh 20:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Only a complete toad would try to use this against you, and I don't think you need to worry they will. If they do, I would certainly back you up. Glad to see the unautoblock went through. - Nunh-huh 20:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks! Good luck to you too! Oh and this block thing (above) I just noticed...that's just funny. Later. Cquan 07:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)