This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jmlk17 (talk | contribs) at 04:03, 8 June 2007 (AIV). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:03, 8 June 2007 by Jmlk17 (talk | contribs) (AIV)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- Thanks for editing my userpage back, no issues you didn't overwrite anything. Appreciated. Riksta 13:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- wikipedia pkk propanganda make.I m this not Pkk anti kurdish wikipedia millitanism noTURKS REVENGE BRİGADE--88.241.3.229 12:06, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm, not exactly sure how to respond to that one. I do assure you, however, that none of my actions are anti-anything, so I'm sorry if any of my reverts came across as such. If you feel they were unjust, please speak with the Arbitration Committee. Thanks, and continue enjoying Misplaced Pages! :) --koder 14:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Reverting archive blanking
Eep, no, I've been out of town a few days. Thank you kindly for putting your oar in on reverting my archive page! RGTraynor 00:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Matthew Pruden Prod
I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Matthew Pruden, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-{{prod}}ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion. Thanks! NickelShoe (Talk) 20:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I was referring to . I suppose you could be right that it wasn't intended as an objection to the deletion, but on the safe side I wouldn't assume that. I noticed your "oops" edit but didn't take it as any particular interpretation of the other editor's intent. Anyway, sorry about any mixup. NickelShoe (Talk) 00:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
AIV
Thanks for the notice put up on WP:AIV about a vandal. They have not as of yet been blocked, due to the fact that they seemed to have stopped editing for now. But keep up the good work, but remember to warn users, as they cannot simply be blocked usually. Jmlk17 04:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)