This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Only (talk | contribs) at 14:53, 13 June 2007 (fix typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:53, 13 June 2007 by Only (talk | contribs) (fix typo)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Flameviper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please put this page on your watchlist, I need someone to talk to...
Decline reason:
- Looks up WP:SOCK*...are sockpuppets allowed by users who are avoiding a block placed upon their main account? Oh look, no. Metros 14:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I never made an "abusive sockpuppet". Two-Sixteen never would have been banned if you thought he was a different person than me. It may as well have been another person.
- Why should my treatment as Two-Sixteen have differed from my treatment as Flameviper?
- That difference in treatment, my friends, is why I was banned.
- I never did anything that was outright evil. I never made personal attacks, I didn't vandalise anything, I didn't violate 3RR or any of the other infinite rules.
- All I did was say something to Elaragirl. On her talk page.
- At the top of her talk page, IN BRIGHT RED LETTERS NO LESS, was a notice from Elaragirl that basically stated that on her talk page, one could be less constrained than normally.
- So I went ahead and spoke my mind. I told her that we were either going to get along or not get along, basically. And that's what I meant. It wasn't intended to be a "personal attack" and both of us acknowledged that. I e-mailed her later on and apoligized for being rude, and she basically told be that it was no big deal and that she didn't mind.
- But it doesn't matter whether I actually violated a rule or not. Metros, who had been riding my ass for the last month or so, seized the opportunity to attack me for the "violation of policy". Techincally, it was a violation of policy, but it wasn't really; the same way that lending someone your money isn't the same as being robbed.
- If Metros hadn't been riding my ass for the month previous to that, I never would have been banned. It's as simple as that; when you try to find fault in someone, you will do so.
- So after a few months of silent reflection that I had imposed upon myself, I decided to start again. I had tried to contact the administrators through every other avenue; my talk page, e-mail, the mailing list, everything. My talk page was locked for "unblock abuse" even though I was just trying to have a conversation. My e-mails to administrators were ignored. The mailing list was of no help whatsoever.
- I had no choice but to create a sockpuppet.