Misplaced Pages

You should use English on this page.

Usted puede utilizar español en esta página, pero solamente si es necesario, porque no soy fluido en español y ésta es la Misplaced Pages en inglés.

Archives The Complete Archives Archive Index by Topic 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26

Thank you

I just came over an image marked by your bot and then checked and found Misplaced Pages:Bots/Requests for approval/MetsBot 11. I saw my request being archived from the bot request page earlier this night and thought all chance of getting my request fulfilled was gone. I just had to say thank you. This was great.

An idea for the bot. The images that has not bin confirmed to be in a category or article on commons may have bin added after the bot checked. Maybe the bot can check these images again after a period. And maybe it should list these images somewhere. Maybe at commons?

Again thank you for the great bot work. Rettetast 22:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I am no image expert...(yet). I am still learning. I would believe it is easiest to check the templates, but there is a third option. It could check what license category the image is in. I'll believe the tags would be easier to compare though but but there are probably templates with different names. I don't know how to deal with them.

As for the PD-problem there is probably no legal issues if the images containes that information, but if it was the en-uploader who released the image to PD, I would imagine the upload log should be there so that it is possible to check the license in the future. If its a random image from the us government that the en-uploader found on the net its not necessary with the en-upload log. Rettetast 07:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

This image was tagged wrong. It is a PD-image, but the Commons page said GFDL. Rettetast 15:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Also check this edit. Rettetast 18:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

I just have to say one more time that this bot feature is great and has saved me a lot of time deleting images. There are almost no backlog left at Category:Images with the same name on Wikimedia Commons.

Some more ideas. Could the bot move the nowcommons template to the top of the image description page when reviewing the image. May save some time.

If the bot can't find the image on commons could it check if the ending is not capitalized. I have seen some images with .JPG at en: but .jpg at commons that the bot has. I have also noticed some images with .jpeg on :en which have bin changed to .jpg on commons.

These would just small fixes and there are no rush to get them implemented. Good luck on your SAT-test. Rettetast 21:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Bot question

Hiya, thanks for creating the bot, but I had a question. It keeps putting flags on Image:David Perry.jpg, an image that I've moved over to Commons, and would like to get deleted from Misplaced Pages now. I've tried fixing the image file to address whatever the bot's concerns on, but it's still not happy. Can you please advise what I can add to the Commons page, to get the bot messages to stop? Thanks, Elonka 17:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

user:Sumibot flooding WP

user:Sumibotis making articles on Indian villages (especially of the state AP) which have no notablity. Sad to see Misplaced Pages being flooded with so many unnotable articles on villages. The number of villages in India run in lakhs. You can't have an article on every village!

And if approve the making of his articles then he should make articles of all the 28 states. --KnowledgeHegemony 11:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

MetsBot flagging of Image:FlattenedRoundPills.jpg

I see your bot flagged Image:FlattenedRoundPills.jpg as possibly not meeting the requirements for deletion, but the source info on Commons looks OK to me. What gives? (Please respond by email or on my talk page, as I might miss responses here.) --Slashme 07:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

User box

Hey. I see you create a lto of userboxes. I was wondering, could you make me one that says " This user strongly dislikes Rosie O'Donnell".

Thanks if you could,

Politics rule 01:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks for responding on my page!

Politics rule 11:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Request

Hi! I've seen you're pretty good at creating .svg-files. I was wondering if you could create something like this one, but without the clock and with something like this instead. I would be really happy if you could do that. I'm planning to use it with this template. --MrStalker 15:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

MetsBot - and Sorry

Firstly, sorry for interrupting any prep for the exam you have tomorrow! Secondly, would you mind if I could have a look at the source code for MetsBot, in the interests of creating my own bot. I have no idea where to begin, but I'm trying to look at other bots code to get an idea. I appreciate any help you give. Thanks, Stwalkerster talk review 09:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

I believe there is no real special source code for MetsBot. User:MetsBot says "This bot runs on the pywikipedia framework for most tasks and AutoWikiBrowser for some." - The pywikipedia framework is freely avaliable and AutoWikiBrowser resides here on WP - WP:AWB. The sources for which, are also avaliable. Reedy Boy 09:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Actually, a huge portion of my bot is in C# with the dotnetwikibot framework, which I've updated MetsBot's page to say. I'll email you the code tonight or later today. —METS501 (talk) 11:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Stwalkerster talk review 11:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

You have to go and show me up dont you Mets ;) Reedy Boy 11:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Best of luck!

Good luck on the SAT you're taking tomorrow! (Not that I think you'll need it. ;) ) ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠιмυМ ≈ √∞ 01:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations on surviving your tests and enjoy your summer!--Cronholm144 07:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Picture

How do you put a picture on your userbox?

Politics rule 14:59, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks for responding!

Politics rule 15:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

MetsBot in regards to Commons Image Tagging

I just wanted to say how immensely helpful MetsBot has been in clearing out image backlogs for images that have been moved to the commons. I have *yet* to see it wrong on an image tag (unless it says X wasn't done, but it's been done since it was tagged), and it's so good, that if MetsBot says it's clear, I don't even question it, I just delete on sight. It's getting so good, that I almost thing you should have it run RFA and let it delete the images itself (although I know people think Adminbots are bad). Thanks again, ^demon 15:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks :-) I'd definitely have it run RFA but I think that people would be too paranoid to let it run as an admin. But that's OK :-) I recently added a feature so that MetsBot will recheck problem images two days after tagging to see if it the problems have been fixed, so that should help out too. —METS501 (talk) 15:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Sounds even better. The commons ones are the backlogs that aren't necessarily the largest, but do take a long time, just because they require so much checking. You've helped a great deal. Keep up the good work, and if you ever need anything done with templates, just let me know, as that's what ^demonBot2 is approved for. ^demon 15:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Administrator Reedy Boy taking off! Hello Mets501, Thankyou for voting in my RfA. You will be pleased to know that it has been successful!! Meaning that I, Reedy Boy, am now an English Misplaced Pages Administrator. It passed with a suprising 47/0/0, and I really am grateful of all your support, and I hope that I live up to your high expectations! If there is anything I can do to help you out, please, do not hesitate to contact me! Yours, Reedy Boy 16:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Talk about History of Automated Adaptive Instruction in Computer Applications

You raised a number of valid complaints on the initial version of this page, and we made changes in response to these complaints. How does it look now? Do you have suggestions for further changes? We are aware that the title is unpleasantly long, but the point is to distinguish this subfield of HCI from a broad, sprawling literature on adaptive instruction that has nothing to do with computer applications. Some of the present paragraphs are rather brief and do not well distinguish what was done in one project versus another, but I think that will solve itself as more people are informed of the existence of this page. -- IH

---

Thanks for your reply. Let me see what content it acquires as a couple of knowledgeable people contribute over the next few weeks (though I will caution them not to add too much since we don't want it to bloat). The non-encyclopedic flavor you mention may reflect the chronologically ordered entries. I just did that because it was an easy way to start, and will provoke experts to add more good information, because people like to set the record straight about who did what first. Once a bit more content and substance is in there, it may be possible and advantageous to reorganize it in a non-chronological fashion, which may help make it more encyclopedia-like.

But to be honest I think the entry on HCI would probably really sprawl if we put this topic in with it, especially since there would be a dozen other subtopic that are equally significant. However, I could imagine a broader entry on "User Interfaces, Adaptive" that might provide a natural home for this and also for other research that involves UIs that adapt to the user rather than trying to teach the user (for example, if you repeatedly hit the wrong command, the adaptive UI may say "would you like us to make a shortcut out of that?" --related to what is being reviewed here, but also different).

Anyway, thanks again for your help--I will keep an eye on this and try to keep it evolving in a useful direction in light of your comments. -- IH

User:UBX/

Hi, I originally prodded this page as it was probably created by mistake, kinda stupid, I should have come to you directly. Anyway, you should perhaps consider putting a redirection to User:UBX and protect the page to prevent more userboxes to be created there by someone not filling the form. -- lucasbfr 08:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry

Don't worry about being bad. Hey, please could you adopt me? Christine118Maureen 16:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Auto Numbered Tables - New Code

How do I propose it? Didn't I just propose it on that Page? I am confused as to how this process works. Please advise. Thanks. (16:58, 12 May 2007 (UTC)) (JosephASpadaro 16:58, 12 May 2007 (UTC))

I guess that Mike Dillon did that after you posted. Is there anything more I need to do? How does this process work, at this point? Thanks. (JosephASpadaro 17:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC))

Hi again. Thanks for your help. WHO monitors whether or not concensus is reached? Me? Or some administrator will do so? And what is "concensus"? People will reply to the post on that page and an Admin will "tally" the votes? Thanks. (JosephASpadaro 17:08, 12 May 2007 (UTC))

Great -- thanks for the info. And good luck on all of your upcoming school / college exams! I remember them well -- and I do not envy you! (JosephASpadaro 18:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC))

Hi, again. It has been a week since I added my proposal about auto-numbering of Tables and Charts. However, no one has added any input, comments, or feedback at all during the entire week. What happens next? Thanks. Please advise. Please see here if you do not recall our previous conversation: User talk: JosephASpadaro ... Thanks.(JosephASpadaro 21:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC))

Hi. I mailed you the above post on May 18, but I never heard back from you. I had assumed that you were busy with school, exams, etc. When I checked back on your Talk Page, I noticed that you archived the above thread without replying back to me. If you have a moment at your convenience, please reply to my question. Thanks a lot. (JosephASpadaro 13:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC))

Thanks for your reply. I will follow up with Mike Dillon again. Thanks. (JosephASpadaro 18:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC))

Meetup

Dear Mets501,

You have either attended or expressed interested in the previous NYC Meetup. I would like to invite you to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Misplaced Pages:Meetup/NYC -- Y not? 15:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

DeadBot

Which tasks have been approved? All used WP:DEAD, so I am not sure. Do you mean only run the deadlink/redirect remover bot, and not the wikify marking part? Thanks! (Note: In the meantime, I am not running the bot at all. Once I get a clarifcation, I will disable the functionality you want me to.) Matt - TheFearow 21:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thanks! I'll update the bot and start it running this afternoon (NZST) when I get home. Matt - TheFearow 21:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Deleting question

The deletion of Xinjiang Chalkis Co.Ltd is in question,this company is the second biggest Ketchup producer in the world.--Ksyrie 06:10, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

wait your reply.--Ksyrie 22:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

please to restore it,I will add the necessary references.--Ksyrie 04:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:TARDIS.jpg

Flicker clearly shows the image as licsenced under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 not Creative Commons Attribution 2.0.Geni 21:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

BRFA

Sorry for bugging you. Could you could do a quick look over on this? I thought it would be quicker then adding the {{BAGAssistanceNeeded}} template to the page. Thank you! --Wikihermit 23:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Siege of Breda.jpg

Hi, your bot MetsBot marked this image as reviewed, "is not in a category or article on Commons". I just added two categories of this image at Commons, may be that template could be removed now. Thanks, Kordas 23:52, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Subst'ing Signatures

Why are you subst'ing signatures that are templates? It mignt be the right thing according to WP:SIG, but have you ever thought that maybe people do it on purpose??? People like me. My Sig is pretty complicated and it looks DISGUSTING in its full form, thats why its A LOT better as a nice, clean, simple template. It also does not prevent you from telling who the writer is since the template its-self is in my name space. Tell me which one you prefer:

 {{User:ChrisDHDR/Sig2}}

OR

 <br><b><span style="background-color: #DFEBFF">— ]<font color="blue">
]]<sup> <span class="plainlinks"><font color="002bb8"> 
 </font></span> • <span class="plainlinks">
<font color="002bb8">  
</font></span></sup></font></span></b>

Make up your mind, and think about undoing you automatic edits.
— ChrisDHDR 16:24, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

You wrote:

Per the developers, who make this site run, the following was added to our signature policy:

Transclusions of templates and parser functions in signatures (like those which appear as {{User:Name/sig}}, for example) are forbidden, because the developers have determined them to be an unnecessary drain on the servers. Transcluded signatures require extra processing--whenever you change your signature source, all talk pages you have posted on must be re-cached.

Signature templates are also vandalism targets, and will be forever, even if the user leaves the project. Simple text signatures, which are stored along with the page content, use no more resources than the comments themselves and avoid these problems.

This cannot be changed: remember that developer statements about technical aspects of the site trump all others. As for the length of your signature, the only thing I can say is that you must remove the images, and should probably consider shortening the code. —METS501 (talk) 16:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

P.S. This might be of interest.

I will think about your comments, and surely make some changes.
— ChrisDHDR 16:38, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Diamond Certification Laboratory of Australia (DCLA)

You deleted Diamond Certification Laboratory of Australia (DCLA),Please explain why since it had all the necessary links and verification.--220.245.190.146 09:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

The article had the ring of an advertisement, and the company it probably not notable enough. It also seemed to contain unverifiable claims. —METS501 (talk) 11:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for Wrangell Islands help

So sorry. I just didn't know where to begin.CharlesRobertCountofNesselrode 03:10, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

This move is part of an effort to make it look as if there is a US claim to certain Arctic islands of Russia. The US State Department has made it very clear that "None of the islands or rocks above were included in the U.S. purchase of Alaska from Russia in 1867, and they have never been claimed by the United States, although Americans were involved in the discovery and exploration of some of them." The move of Wrangel Island with one "l" (an island of Russia) to Wrangell Island (Northern) is based on the assertions of a small lobbying group called State Department Watch. These claims, along with the change in spelling, are supported only by this private group, and not backed up by any reliable source. Would you mind helping to undo these unjustified moves? Thanks. --Reuben 16:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Autoconfirmed level

You made a post on the mailing list back in January about adding edit count for people to become autoconfirmed. Someone on WT:PROTECT just brought up something like this, so I was wondering if anything ever happened with this (I don't think anything did, but maybe I just missed that). Thanks Mets. -Royalguard11(Talk·Review Me!) 20:14, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

talkarchive templates

I saw that you reverted my change. I did not know that the template was also used outside the user space. I appologize for that. Please have a look at my updated suggestion at Template_talk:Talkarchive#Add_Reference_to_User_and_Link_to_User_Page. Wouldn't that work for all name spaces? Let me know what you think. I don't want to create my own template for this (again), if there should be one template that works for all, that would be the best. Don't you think? Thanks. --roy<sac> .oOo. 04:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Why Are You Using My Account?

Why Are You Using My Account?Please Resolve This By 22 June 2007 Paul 1953 11:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

IF YOU DON'T RESOLVE THIS,I'M GOING TO COMPLAIN TO THE WIKI AUTHORITIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:( Paul 1953 12:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Are you meaning he edited your user page? Reedy Boy 20:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Funnly looking kid?

Hi, any chance you can delete this page below. That's my son, and he's rather good looking in my POV opinion.

]

Excalibur 20:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the help ;-)

Re:Account

I think you got it wrong.My Wiki id is there!It's so confusing.

P.S Maybe I should leave Misplaced Pages for good.Paul 1953 10:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

What is wrong with your bot?

It has reviewed a number of satellite images including in the TC wikiproject, which has appropriate documentation and links where possible, and it appears to be suggestion mass deletions. Do you see anything missing within their documentation (i.e, Image:Levi1997052603GMS5VS.jpg)? I'm going to inform the TC wikiproject that they're about to lose of number of images because of this bot. Thegreatdr 17:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

That's good to know...the panic has ended. We've lost a number of images over the past year or two because of bots. I'm very suspicious of them, due to past history. Thegreatdr 17:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Metsbot

Why did this mark a lot of my photos as "passing requirements for deletion"? Does this mean they will be deleted or they will not be?Chris Nelson 18:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:6aznehj.png and kin

I highly object to you "fixing" album covers uploaded by someone who deliberately falsely claimed self authorship of them. If you look at his contribution history he's not just a mis-tagging newbie, they were deliberate. -N 13:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry. But actually, was it the edit that was the problem, or the edit summary? Was there something wrong with the edit itself? —METS501 (talk) 19:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Nothing was wrong with it, really. The files do qualify as fair use. I was just hoping they'd be deleted so that I could issue the user a copyright warning if they did it again. (Still could I suppose). You did an excellent job writing the fair use summaries. Sorry for pissing at you. -N 20:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

It's fine with me :-) Just don't forget: we never want people to do something wrong just to issue warnings and do a "gotcha!" type of block. —METS501 (talk) 20:13, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Deletion criteria question

I've been marking my photos previously uploaded to WP that are now on Commons with {{subst:ncd}}. They have been tagged with "This image does not give credit to uploader Zaui on Commons." First, I'm not sure what this means. The name of the uploader is shown on the image page on Commons, is this what is meant by 'credit'? Second, I uploaded most of them to Commons anyway and my user name (Zaui) is already there. What more is needed? Thanks in advance. — Zaui (talk) 16:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Whoops, that's a bug in the bot code. If the same person uploaded it, then there's really no need to give "credit". Thanks for letting me know. —METS501 (talk) 19:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Where do I put this userbox?

Hi. What category do you think I should put this userbox in? {{User:Userboxes Only!/Userboxes/Userbox 4}}Userboxes Only! 17:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

That userbox would be better without the first sentence. The last is all that's needed.Chris Nelson 17:40, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I did that. No where should it go?Userboxes Only! 19:13, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

I would recommend deleting that userbox as it's very divisive. I have no idea what category it should go in. —METS501 (talk) 19:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Divisive?Chris Nelson 20:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, divisive (divisive = creating dissension or discord) The exact type of userbox that caused so much controversy in the past and doesn't help us get along at all. —METS501 (talk) 20:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Well I know what divisive means. I just don't see how the userbox could be controversial, it simply represents a well-known, long-running joke. I should point out that this joke does have it's own Misplaced Pages article. If the userbox goes, the article would have to go too. (I'd disagree with either move.)Chris Nelson 20:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Everyone's entitled to their opinions, and I respect yours. I'm not going to go and delete it out of process, don't worry; I was just mentioning that I thought it was divisive. —METS501 (talk) 20:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Re : Your meta edits

Thanks for letting me know. :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 11:25, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Possible bot malfunction?

Greetings; MetBot recently tagged Image:Roanhighbluffnorth1.jpg as possibly having an improper license for Commons and thus may not be deleted. Please take a look and see if you can figure out what is wrong with the material, as I cannot see any problems. Cheers! -- Huntster 14:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Good timing, I just created a help page for that task :-) See User:MetsBot/Comons tagging. —METS501 (talk) 16:29, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

You mean, User:MetsBot/Commons tagging? Sorry, I'm a spelling nazi ;) In any case, thanks for taking another look at that image. I was scratching my head as to what was wrong! -- Huntster 16:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Whoops, thanks for pointing that out! —METS501 (talk) 17:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Wikinews compliment

Thank you for your comment on my wikinewsreports.blogspot story, I'm glad to hear my blog-writing is ok. Feel free to have a look on Wikinews anytime! --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 23:24, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Your Question About The George Foreman Picture

Thanks for deleting that duplicate copy, I didn't mean to do that.

Per your inquiry about the picture, I met him at the Miami Airport and took a picture with him. I edited it to cut myself out. Thanks --Iron Chef 23:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Wow! What a great shot! —METS501 (talk) 23:50, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah I know its not the best picture for his article, but its better than none right? :) --Iron Chef 23:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Image deletion

Hi ^demon; I recommend you don't delete images from here as NowCommons when they are not in a category or article on commons. I could blame this on you being unaware of that rule, but when the message by my bot says it, that excuse isn't as valid anymore :-) —METS501 (talk) 13:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that. ^demon 13:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

No problem :-) —METS501 (talk) 13:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Bot trial approval

Hola Mets501,

Thanks for approving a trial for my bot request so quickly. A small question: Do I also need to receive approval to use AWB before proceeding with my bot trial? -- TypoBot 21:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Gracias.

I just approved you for AWB. :-) You won't have access to the auto-save, but you won't need it for the typo fixing. Also, you should be careful not to edit with your bot's account outside its approved functions (for example, the question that you posted on my talk page should have been done with your account, not your bot's). —METS501 (talk) 21:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for addressing the issue of editing with my bot account! I wasn't sure. -- Saaga 21:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Go to hell.

You, Carnildo, your cronies, and your bots are ruining Misplaced Pages. All of you really need to get a life. I go on Misplaced Pages because I believe that adding content is an amazing and fun thing. You all destroy content because it makes you feel like you have some sort of authority. Authority on an internet encyclopedia. You're all so pathetic.

Block me and maybe it'll make up for being teased on the playground as a kid. Love, Juppiter 23:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

KARMAFIST FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!