This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Durin (talk | contribs) at 02:26, 14 July 2007 (Restoring deleted text from Quadell and responding to Mosquera). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:26, 14 July 2007 by Durin (talk | contribs) (Restoring deleted text from Quadell and responding to Mosquera)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)My full length image rationale is here. My statement on anti-fair use hysteria is here.
Why thank you
Thanks for the barnstar! It is clear that you and I are on the same page re our mutual "friend". PageantUpdater 01:50, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
The irony is that we were both targeted after posting pictures of pretty girls. Maybe the problem is something more than policy. ;-)
Mosquera 02:20, 12 July 2007
Groovy
Love your "world's most detailed explanation". Mind if I cut and paste it onto the explanation for some of my images and await the inevitable non-response? ==OneCyclone 04:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Feel free. I hope it helps. Mosquera 04:38, 12 July 2007
Essay
Very good essay here. You should make it available at your user page, somewhere. You can move the barnstar wherever you like. Badagnani 17:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC) The Editor's Barnstar
Mereces tu propia estrella, mi amigo. 128.97.247.131 10:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Reported your sockpuppetry on ANI
Mosquera, you should be glad I didn't block you again for your little sockpuppetry stunt while blocked yesterday. But don't push it please. I've mentioned you at WP:ANI. Future Perfect at Sunrise 20:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Re : Are you seriously claiming "Tarmikos" was not your sockpuppet? User:Future Perfect at Sunrise 20:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
This is not a video game. I fully expected you to do something like that. You seem to not understand to you are behaving in such a heavy handed manner. Rather than discuss issues, you seek to punish me for a petty policy issue. As I wrote on your talk page:
- You many not remove good-faith posting from talk pages.
- The posting you claim is sockpuppetry appeared after the block expired.
- I am dishonored that you consistently behave as though I am sullying your pristine social experiment. three days ago, I didn't know you. Now you're in my face, all over a jpeg file.
- I must insist that you apologize for putting technocratic ideals over simple human decency. I attempted to pleasantly instruct you that human beings matter more than political abstractions. I'm sorry you took offense, but in no way was it my intention.
- Leave me in peace, as I intend positive contributions to Misplaced Pages.
Thank you and have a pleasant day. Mosquera
Stop wikilawyering please. You evaded your block. Tarmikos edited while you were blocked. That's normally an automatic reason to reset and lengthen the block on your main account. As for "removing good-faith postings from talk pages", if Tarmikos is your sockpuppet, then you posting barnstars on his page is not a good-faith edit. Stop it please. Thank you. Future Perfect at Sunrise 0:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- For the record, it does appear that you evaded your block by posting as Tarmikos, and by posting as Enríuqui and the bare IP 77.181.77.173 as well. It's over at this point, and I have no interest in getting into it. I'm just stating the facts for the record. – Quadell 20:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- ! You blocked me just in time to keep me from responding to your hate speech and personal attacks on AN/I about me dressing up as Spiderman. If you believe that TV shows are non-notable because they are broadcasted to Latinos, then you are a disgusting racist who has no business being on Misplaced Pages in the first place. ¡chau! Mosquera
- The Spiderman reference is in reference to a silly stunt by a real life person who dressed as Spiderman and climbed the Reichstag. Please see and read Misplaced Pages:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man. --Durin 02:26, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Blocked again?
You have been temporarily in accordance with Misplaced Pages's for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}FayssalF 20:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
For speaking up for myself, I am accused of wikilawyering. These are not mere words. They are the core values of modern civilization, as explained by Immanuel Kant:
We ought not to value technocratic ideals over common decency. Human beings matter more than political abstractions. We should not treat people as if they were mere objects, existing only to serve our own ends. We ought to treat them as if their goals and desires are just as important as ours.
If I am a blot on the landscape, send me to arbitration. Otherwise, I ask to be left alone.
Thank you and have a pleasant day. Mosquera
- Arbitration is the last step in dispute resolution, not the first. Please see Misplaced Pages:Resolving disputes for further instructions. --Durin 02:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)