Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Networks and partnerships - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mike Rosoft (talk | contribs) at 15:36, 27 May 2005 (VfD vote: Networks and partnerships - delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:36, 27 May 2005 by Mike Rosoft (talk | contribs) (VfD vote: Networks and partnerships - delete)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Networks and partnerships

Unencyclopedic and original research. This page may also have been already deleted yesterday. Delete JeremyA 03:06, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

The page was not deleted merely modified to make it more encyclopedic.Leave

Delete non-encyclopedic Bgeer 16:09, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. Could have been speedy deleted as nonsense. Plus, it's probably a copyvio too. ~leif ☺ (talk) 22:40, May 25, 2005 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I have a problem with this comment. While I agree that this is original work from my students it is in no way a copyright violation and the suggestion that this is the case is insulting and defamitory. I would also like to draw this person's attention to the following rules of Misplaced Pages which appear to have been ignored on the Misplaced Pages link he has included to his wikipedia home page:

  • Please do not bite the newcomers
  • Don't create articles about yourself
  • Don't insert links to your own home pageScot Aldred
  • Delete pointless, unencyclopedic. - Etacar11 23:19, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Please explain how this is unencylopedic--is it that there are too few links to other parts of Misplaced Pages? I've looked at the guidelines and fail to see how this is unencyclopedic.Scot Aldred