This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gnevin (talk | contribs) at 17:23, 28 July 2007 (→[]: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:23, 28 July 2007 by Gnevin (talk | contribs) (→[]: reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Please add new threads to the bottom of the page. Note that all threads older than 7 days will be archived.
Misunderstanding
Hi C.Greg, It seems we have a misunderstanding. it is true i was fooling around with that page in some aspects. However, if it is to be a true neutral article both sides of a story should be shown. now do i edit what they write to be true or do I add what is true in an article after the opening. My father was a creator of the school so as far as my knowledge of the topic I know more than they would like to share. is that against the rules? btw iam sorry for the slanderous remarks i did make. be it known however they were made in jest and there was no foul play involved.
well in that case why would the article be there in the first place? It was written by someone directly affiliated with the school in question. Their side of the story is the only one presented. Therefore I would like to add my experience with that particular school as an actual student. if neutrality is what is wanted then you cannot only accept what the page maker would like you to believe about the school.
as far as proof... what proof is there that a student was expelled for dying their hair from brown to blond? or a student being expelled for not wearing their blazer jacket walking into the building even though their star student did the same without any reprocussions. How is it that those researching the school can get a picture of what they are getting into without any first hand accounts and the only sources are those that make the school out to be something it isnt. Iam trying to balance the article as it is already wildy tilted one way.
-lobo —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Duvalp (talk • contribs) 01:46, 21 July 2007 (UTC).
C.Greg? I think it's C.Fred... Rubyandme 02:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Congratz
|
The R&B and Soul Music Award | |
| I, Eduemoni, award the R&B and Soul Music Award to C.Fred for because his contribuitions within the scoupe of the project. We really need wiki-users like you. Misplaced Pages really apreciates your edits. |
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Eduemoni (talk • contribs) 02:08, 22 July 2007 (UTC).
Renegade Boards
I'm trying to post information about a forum board. If it's irrelevant to wikipedia, then howcome ign is on here? They're basically the same thing. This website has been expanding since August of 06. They've proven to be a live forum board in several ways. I request that u put the page back up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Inviolable warrior (talk • contribs) 04:15, 22 July 2007 (UTC).
Knights of the North variants
Thanks! I think there's just "The Knights Of The North"(w/quotes) left, but there's a lot of possible permutations between bad caps and missing words. MSJapan 22:19, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
re: The AnimeLand
Look at the contributions of Jiky (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who originally created the first AnimeLand article. That user was blocked as a sock of Danny, and I'm pretty sure that this Lonikja user is a sock as well. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 01:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Hindustan movement
This person says they got permission from a site; not sure if they do or not, but if they do I'm still worried about WP:BIO and WP:SPAM. Can you check it? -WarthogDemon 23:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'll watch the page and see what happens. Thanks. :) -WarthogDemon 01:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Re:Ruari Og
Your welcome , thanks for the speedy action . Thanks for letting me know about tag never knew about it I'll use it from now on as it seems better than {{copy-vio}}(Gnevin 17:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC))